{"id":1419,"date":"2026-06-08T21:15:01","date_gmt":"2026-06-08T19:15:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/horscadre.paris\/young-girls-at-the-piano-renoirs-first-official-commission\/"},"modified":"2026-08-24T22:42:39","modified_gmt":"2026-08-24T20:42:39","slug":"young-girls-at-the-piano-renoirs-first-official-commission","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/horscadre.paris\/en\/young-girls-at-the-piano-renoirs-first-official-commission\/","title":{"rendered":"Young Girls at the Piano \u2014 Renoir&#8217;s First Official Commission"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Paris, early 1892.<\/strong> Pierre-Auguste Renoir was <strong>fifty-one years<\/strong> old. He had behind him <strong>a thirty-year artistic career<\/strong>, <strong>four of the eight Impressionist exhibitions<\/strong>, the <strong>absolute masterpiece<\/strong> <em>*Le Bal du moulin de la Galette*<\/em> (1876), the <strong>scandal<\/strong> of his <strong>Ingresque period<\/strong> (1881\u20131888), and now a <strong>mature body of work<\/strong> in which he achieves a synthesis between <strong>classical drawing<\/strong> and <strong>the Impressionist palette<\/strong>. But <strong>one fact remains<\/strong> \u2014a fact that his <strong>friends and admirers<\/strong> find <strong>scandalous<\/strong>: <strong>the French government has never placed a single official commission with the painter<\/strong>. No national museum owns a Renoir. Not a single work has been purchased with public funds.    <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This <strong>institutional anomaly<\/strong> <strong>deeply<\/strong> troubled <strong>St\u00e9phane Mallarm\u00e9<\/strong> (1842\u20131898), the <strong>Symbolist poet<\/strong> who was then <strong>a respected figure<\/strong> in <strong>the Parisian art world<\/strong>. Mallarm\u00e9 had known Renoir personally since the 1870s. He had been friends with <strong>Manet<\/strong> (who painted his <strong>portrait in 1876<\/strong>, now in the Mus\u00e9e d\u2019Orsay). He <strong>deeply<\/strong> admired Renoir\u2019s work. <strong>He decided to take action.<\/strong>   <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">With the support of <strong>Roger Marx<\/strong> (1859\u20131913), <strong>a young civil servant<\/strong> in<strong>the Fine Arts Administration<\/strong> who was open to <strong>innovative movements<\/strong>, Mallarm\u00e9 orchestrated <strong>discreet efforts<\/strong> <strong>in the spring of 1892<\/strong> to bring <strong>Impressionist<\/strong> works <strong>into the national collections<\/strong>. <strong>Roger Marx<\/strong>, who worked as a journalist and art critic alongside his administrative duties, had recently been appointed <strong>Inspector General of Museums<\/strong> and <strong>had the necessary authority<\/strong> to place <strong>official commissions<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>The result of this restoration project<\/strong> was an <strong>informal commission<\/strong> awarded to Pierre-Auguste Renoir to create a <strong>work for the Mus\u00e9e du Luxembourg<\/strong> \u2014then known as <strong>the Mus\u00e9e des Artistes Vivants<\/strong> and dedicated to<strong>contemporary French art<\/strong>. Renoir, <strong>proud<\/strong> of this <strong>first official recognition<\/strong> at the age of 51, <strong>chose his subject<\/strong>: <strong><em>Young Girls at the Piano<\/em><\/strong>. He set to work <strong>with relentless dedication<\/strong> \u2014such was his determination that he painted <strong>six<\/strong> different <strong>versions<\/strong> of the same composition, <strong>four<\/strong> of which <strong>were signed<\/strong> (and thus considered finished), yet <strong>he remained unsatisfied<\/strong> with any of them.  <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The version ultimately acquired by the French government in <strong>1892<\/strong> is now housed at <strong>the Mus\u00e9e d\u2019Orsay<\/strong>. This article recounts the <strong>precise genesis<\/strong> of this work\u2014<strong>the discreet Mallarm\u00e9-Roger Marx operation<\/strong> to bring Renoir into public collections, the <strong>mature technique<\/strong> of the <strong>\u201cpearly\u201d period<\/strong> (1890\u20131897), the <strong>obsessive perfectionism<\/strong> that led Renoir to paint <strong>six<\/strong> nearly identical <strong>versions<\/strong>, and the work\u2019s unique <strong>historical status<\/strong> as <strong>the first official recognition<\/strong> of a major Impressionist painter by French institutions. <\/p>\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">1892 \u2014 Renoir is 51 years old and still has not received an official commission<\/h2>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">To understand <strong>the significance<\/strong> of the work, one must understand the <strong>institutional context<\/strong> in which Renoir found himself in the early 1890s.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>A thirty-year career<\/strong>. Renoir began exhibiting at the Paris Salon in <strong>1864<\/strong> \u2014he was <strong>accepted<\/strong> there <strong>sporadically<\/strong> between 1864 and 1872. He participated in <strong>the Impressionist exhibitions<\/strong> of <strong>1874, 1876, 1877, and 1882<\/strong> \u2014four out of eight. He painted <strong>several hundred paintings<\/strong> during this period. He enjoyed <strong>moderate commercial success<\/strong> thanks to the art dealer <strong>Paul Durand-Ruel<\/strong>, who had been championing the Impressionists since 1870.    <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>But the French government never bought anything from him.<\/strong> In 1892, at <strong>the age of 51<\/strong>, Renoir found himself in a <strong>paradoxical<\/strong> situation for a painter:<\/p>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Recognized<\/strong> by his peers (Monet, Pissarro, Cassatt, Berthe Morisot)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Prized<\/strong> by private collectors (Caillebotte, Charpentier, Ephrussi)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Commercially viable<\/strong> thanks to the private market<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>But completely absent<\/strong> from <strong>France&#8217;s national museums<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This <strong>institutional invisibility<\/strong> can be attributed to <strong>several factors<\/strong>:<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>1. Persistent academic resistance<\/strong>.<strong>The \u00c9cole des Beaux-Arts<\/strong> and<strong>the Academy<\/strong> still regarded Impressionism as a <strong>frivolous movement<\/strong>, unworthy of national collections. Several <strong>academicians<\/strong> (notably <strong>Jean-L\u00e9on G\u00e9r\u00f4me<\/strong>, <strong>William Bouguereau<\/strong>, and <strong>Alexandre Cabanel<\/strong>) <strong>actively block<\/strong> any entry of Impressionist works into museums.  <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>2. The lack of a formal mechanism<\/strong>. At the time, <strong>French national museums<\/strong> acquired works primarily through <strong>private donations<\/strong>, <strong>purchases at the Salon<\/strong>, or <strong>official commissions<\/strong> focused on <strong>academic historical painting<\/strong>. The <strong>system<\/strong> itself was <strong>not designed<\/strong> to accommodate avant-garde contemporary art.  <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>3. Administrative reluctance<\/strong>. Museum <strong>curators<\/strong> are <strong>cautious<\/strong> \u2014they fear the <strong>criticism<\/strong> that might arise if <strong>public funds were spent<\/strong> on works that <strong>are<\/strong> still <strong>controversial<\/strong> among the general public. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For Renoir, at <strong>age 51<\/strong>, this situation was becoming <strong>a psychological burden<\/strong>. He knew his <strong>career<\/strong> was entering its <strong>late maturity<\/strong> \u2014he was beginning to experience the <strong>first signs<\/strong> of <strong>joint pain<\/strong> (which would be diagnosed as rheumatoid arthritis a few years later). He <strong>wanted<\/strong> at least one <strong>of his works<\/strong> to be included in the <strong>national collections<\/strong> during his lifetime.  <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">It is this <strong>unspoken expectation<\/strong> that his friends will use as <strong>a catalyst for action<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">St\u00e9phane Mallarm\u00e9 and Roger Marx \u2014 The Rehabilitation Effort<\/h2>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>The initiative<\/strong> came primarily from <strong>St\u00e9phane Mallarm\u00e9<\/strong> (1842\u20131898), a <strong>central<\/strong> figure in <strong>the Parisian art world<\/strong> of the 1880s and 1890s.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In 1892, <strong>St\u00e9phane Mallarm\u00e9<\/strong> was one of <strong>the greatest living French poets<\/strong>. Author of <strong><em>*Les Fen\u00eatres*<\/em><\/strong> (1863), and <strong><em>*L&#8217;Apr\u00e8s-midi d&#8217;un faune*<\/em><\/strong> (1876, from which <strong>Claude Debussy<\/strong> drew inspiration for his <strong>orchestral prelude<\/strong> in 1894), and <strong><em>*A Roll of the Dice Will Never Abolish Chance*<\/em><\/strong> (1897)\u2014he hosted <strong>the famous \u201cTuesdays on Rue de Rome\u201d<\/strong> \u2014his <strong>literary salon<\/strong> where <strong>Paul Verlaine<\/strong>, <strong>Paul Val\u00e9ry<\/strong>, <strong>Andr\u00e9 Gide<\/strong>, <strong>Joris-Karl Huysmans<\/strong>, and             <strong>several Impressionist painters<\/strong>, including <strong>\u00c9douard Manet<\/strong>, <strong>Berthe Morisot<\/strong>, <strong>Edgar Degas<\/strong>, and <strong>Pierre-Auguste Renoir<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Mallarm\u00e9 had maintained a <strong>deep friendship<\/strong> with <strong>\u00c9douard Manet<\/strong> since the 1870s. Manet painted him in <strong>1876<\/strong> in an <strong>intimate portrait<\/strong> (27.5 \u00d7 36 cm, now in the Mus\u00e9e d\u2019Orsay)\u2014a small, <strong>precious<\/strong> painting that has, <strong>in hindsight<\/strong>, become one of <strong>the<\/strong> poet\u2019s <strong>most famous portraits<\/strong>. Upon Manet\u2019s death in 1883, Mallarm\u00e9 <strong>delivered the eulogy<\/strong> at his funeral.  <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Mallarm\u00e9 had known <strong>Renoir personally<\/strong> since that same decade. He <strong>frequented<\/strong> Renoir\u2019s Parisian studios, <strong>discussed<\/strong> painting and poetry with him, and <strong>occasionally purchased<\/strong> minor works for his <strong>small private collection<\/strong>. Like all his Parisian intellectual contemporaries, he had a <strong>deep admiration<\/strong> for Renoir\u2019s work.  <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>In the spring of 1892<\/strong>, Mallarm\u00e9 decided to <strong>put his network to work for Renoir<\/strong>. He turned to a <strong>valued colleague<\/strong> in the civil service: <strong>Roger Marx<\/strong> (1859\u20131913). <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Roger Marx<\/strong> is a <strong>young civil servant<\/strong> in<strong>the Fine Arts Administration<\/strong>. As <strong>an art critic<\/strong> in addition to his official duties, he <strong>actively supports<\/strong> <strong>innovative movements<\/strong> \u2014he has written for several <strong>specialized journals<\/strong> (<strong><em>Revue encyclop\u00e9dique<\/em><\/strong>, <strong><em>Gazette des Beaux-Arts<\/em><\/strong>) in support of<strong>Impressionism<\/strong>,<strong>Art Nouveau<\/strong>, and the <strong>Nabis<\/strong>. Around 1890, he became <strong>Inspector General<\/strong> of the Fine Arts Administration\u2014a position that <strong>gave<\/strong> him <strong>the authority<\/strong> to place <strong>official commissions<\/strong> and<strong>influence<\/strong> museum <strong>acquisitions<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>The Mallarm\u00e9-Roger Marx alliance<\/strong> was, in fact, <strong>the key<\/strong> to<strong>the Impressionists&#8217; entry<\/strong> into French public collections in the early 1890s. Roger Marx <strong>discreetly advised<\/strong> Mallarm\u00e9 on <strong>administrative procedures<\/strong>, <strong>identified<\/strong> available <strong>budgets<\/strong>, and <strong>suggested arguments<\/strong> that might convince the higher-ups. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>In the spring and summer of 1892<\/strong>, Mallarm\u00e9 and Roger Marx <strong>took action<\/strong>. They convinced<strong>the administration of the Beaux-Arts<\/strong> to place an <strong>informal commission<\/strong> with Pierre-Auguste Renoir for a <strong>work intended for the Mus\u00e9e du Luxembourg<\/strong> \u2014a Parisian museum dedicated to<strong>contemporary French art<\/strong> (located until 1937 in<strong>the former orangery<\/strong> of <strong>the Palais du Luxembourg<\/strong>, 6th arrondissement). <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The <strong>commission was placed<\/strong> <strong>sometime in 1892<\/strong>. <strong>Mallarm\u00e9<\/strong> <strong>personally informed<\/strong> Renoir of it during a visit to his studio. Renoir accepted <strong>with great emotion<\/strong> \u2014it was the <strong>institutional recognition<\/strong> he <strong>had been waiting for for thirty years<\/strong>.  <\/p>\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">The 1892 Commission \u2014 Renoir Chooses His Subject<\/h2>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Renoir had complete freedom<\/strong> to <strong>choose the subject<\/strong> and <strong>composition<\/strong>. The commission was <strong>informal<\/strong> \u2014no <strong>specific requirements<\/strong>, no <strong>set dimensions<\/strong>, and no <strong>prescribed theme<\/strong>. Renoir was simply expected to deliver <strong>a work representative<\/strong> of his art, <strong>worthy of inclusion<\/strong> in the national collections.  <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Renoir <strong>thought long and hard<\/strong> about which work to choose. According to <strong>accounts<\/strong> reported by Georges Rivi\u00e8re (1921) and <strong>Albert Andr\u00e9<\/strong> (a painter and friend of Renoir\u2019s), he <strong>wavered<\/strong> between: <\/p>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>A <strong>ball scene<\/strong> (a <strong>continuation<\/strong> of <em>*The Ball at the Moulin de la Galette*<\/em>)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>A <strong>solo portrait<\/strong> (a genre in which he had several commercial successes)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>An <strong>intimate scene featuring women<\/strong> (a genre he <strong>has explored<\/strong> extensively since 1880)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>He ultimately chose<\/strong> the <strong>intimate female scene<\/strong> \u2014more specifically, the <strong>theme<\/strong> of <strong>young girls at the piano<\/strong>. There are several well-documented <strong>reasons<\/strong> for this: <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>1. A respectable \u201cbourgeois\u201d theme<\/strong>. In <strong>1890s France<\/strong>, the <strong>piano<\/strong> was the ultimate <strong>symbol<\/strong> of the <strong>cultured bourgeoisie<\/strong>. Every \u201cproper\u201d bourgeois family had an <strong>upright piano<\/strong> in its <strong>living room<\/strong>, on which the <strong>daughters<\/strong> learned to play. The <strong>theme<\/strong> is therefore institutionally <strong>respectable<\/strong>.   <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>2. A recurring theme in his work<\/strong>. Renoir had already explored this subject a few years earlier with <strong><em>*The Piano Lesson*<\/em><\/strong> (c. 1889, private collection). He <strong>is familiar with<\/strong> the composition, the <strong>dynamics of the two female figures<\/strong>, and the <strong>rendering of the piano<\/strong>.  <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>3. A theme suited to the \u201cpearly period<\/strong>.\u201d The <strong>artistic period<\/strong> in which Renoir found himself in 1892\u2014 <strong>the \u201cPearly Period\u201d<\/strong> (1890\u20131897)\u2014emphasized <strong>intimate scenes featuring women<\/strong>, in which Renoir could showcase his <strong>characteristic treatment<\/strong> of <strong>luminous flesh tones<\/strong> and <strong>silky textiles<\/strong>. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>4. A concession to bourgeois tastes, but not a betrayal<\/strong>. Renoir <strong>adapts his subject matter<\/strong> to <strong>the institutional patron<\/strong> \u2014he knows that an <strong>intimate bourgeois scene<\/strong> will be <strong>more readily accepted<\/strong> by the administration than a scene of <strong>a popular open-air dance hall<\/strong>. But he <strong>does not abandon<\/strong> his style\u2014the <strong>modernity of his painting<\/strong> remains <strong>intact<\/strong>.  <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>May\u2013December 1892<\/strong>: Renoir worked on the painting <strong>without any major interruptions<\/strong> for <strong>several months<\/strong>. He produced <strong>several preparatory studies<\/strong> (including a <strong>pastel<\/strong> of the same dimensions, now in a <strong>private collection<\/strong>, and a smaller <strong>oil sketch<\/strong> housed at <strong>the Mus\u00e9e de l\u2019Orangerie<\/strong>). <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Late 1892\u2013early 1893<\/strong>: The <strong>final version<\/strong> was <strong>delivered<\/strong> to the Ministry of Fine Arts, which<strong>accepted it<\/strong>. It then became part of the collections of <strong>the Mus\u00e9e du Luxembourg<\/strong>. <\/p>\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">The Painting \u2014 What It Depicts<\/h2>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong><em>Young Girls at the Piano<\/em><\/strong> is an <strong>oil on canvas<\/strong> measuring <strong>116 \u00d7 90 centimeters<\/strong> \u2014 <strong>a vertical<\/strong>, <strong>medium-to-large<\/strong> <strong>format<\/strong>, the traditional size for intimate <strong>group portraits<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The painting depicts <strong>two young girls<\/strong> in a typical <strong>upper-class parlor<\/strong> of <strong>the late 19th century<\/strong>, <strong>playing the piano<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Main figure, on the left<\/strong>: a <strong>young blonde girl<\/strong>, about <strong>15\u201317 years old<\/strong>, <strong>sitting at the piano<\/strong>, <strong>seen in profile<\/strong>. She is wearing a <strong>white dress<\/strong> with a lace collar and <strong>a colorful fabric belt<\/strong> around her waist. Her <strong>hands<\/strong> are <strong>resting on the keyboard<\/strong> \u2014she <strong>is playing<\/strong> or <strong>has just finished playing<\/strong>.   Her <strong>gaze<\/strong> is <strong>fixed<\/strong> on the <strong>sheet music<\/strong> lying open before her. <strong>Calm concentration<\/strong>. <strong>Her blonde hair falls loosely<\/strong> down her back, <strong>tied with a ribbon<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Secondary figure, on the right<\/strong>: a <strong>young girl with brown hair<\/strong> (perhaps a little younger, 13\u201315 years old), <strong>standing<\/strong> behind the pianist, <strong>leaning on the piano<\/strong> in profile. She is wearing a darker <strong>orange dress<\/strong> with <strong>a closed neckline<\/strong>. She <strong>is looking at the sheet music<\/strong> \u2014 <strong>the<\/strong> pianist\u2019s <strong>musical partner<\/strong>. Her <strong>gaze<\/strong> is also fixed on the sheet music. <strong>Her brown hair<\/strong> is pulled back into <strong>a high bun<\/strong>.   <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>The two young girls<\/strong> can be <strong>identified by their physical characteristics<\/strong>:<\/p>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Approximate age<\/strong>: teenage girls, around 13\u201317 years old<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The <strong>difference in hair color<\/strong> suggests <strong>two separate people<\/strong> \u2014not the same model in two poses<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The <strong>models<\/strong> are <strong>not<\/strong> specifically <strong>identified<\/strong> in contemporary sources\u2014Renoir was in the habit of <strong>painting the daughters<\/strong> of <strong>the bourgeois families<\/strong> he associated with (notably the <strong>Lerolle daughters<\/strong>, whom he would paint five years later in a similar work, <em>*Yvonne and Christine Lerolle at the Piano*<\/em> from 1897, Orangerie Museum)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>The piano<\/strong>: a black lacquered <strong>upright piano<\/strong>, seen in <strong>a three-quarter view<\/strong>. Its strict <strong>geometric lines<\/strong> \u2014 <strong>the rectangles<\/strong> of the keyboard, the lid, and the back panel\u2014contrast with the <strong>flowing lines<\/strong> of the two young girls. <strong>On the piano<\/strong>: a <strong>small bouquet of flowers<\/strong> in a vase, <strong>familiar objects<\/strong> found in a middle-class home. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>In the background, on the right<\/strong>: a <strong>pleated<\/strong>, <strong>orange-red velvet curtain<\/strong> that covers the wall on the right. <strong>A spatial clue<\/strong> to <strong>domestic bourgeoisie<\/strong> \u2014the interior is <strong>socially coded<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>The palette<\/strong> is dominated by <strong>warm, pearlescent tones<\/strong>:<\/p>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Pale roses<\/strong> on the skin of the two young girls<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The <strong>warm orange<\/strong> hue of the standing girl&#8217;s dress<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>The off-white color<\/strong> of the pianist&#8217;s dress<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Brownish red<\/strong> of the velvet curtain<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The piano&#8217;s <strong>deep black<\/strong> <\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>There are no<\/strong> vibrating, <strong>juxtaposed brushstrokes<\/strong> as in <em>*Le Bal du moulin de la Galette*<\/em> \u2014on the contrary, there are <strong>soft chromatic transitions<\/strong>, <strong>subtle modeling<\/strong>, and delicate <strong>gradations<\/strong>. This is the <strong>technique of his<\/strong> mature, <strong>pearlescent period<\/strong>. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>The drawing is firm and precise<\/strong>. The <strong>outlines<\/strong> of the two young girls are <strong>clearly defined<\/strong> \u2014a legacy of the <strong>Ingresque period<\/strong> (1881\u20131888). But <strong>the color palette<\/strong> is <strong>lyrical and luminous<\/strong> \u2014a legacy of early<strong>Impressionism<\/strong>.  <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">As summarized in the <strong>official description from the Mus\u00e9e d&#8217;Orsay<\/strong>:<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>&#8220;The firm yet supple line work clearly defines the figures while giving free rein to the lyricism of the color palette.&#8221;<\/em><\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>\u2014 Mus\u00e9e d&#8217;Orsay, official entry for *Young Girls at the Piano*<\/em><\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">It is this successful <strong>blend<\/strong> of <strong>classicism<\/strong> and <strong>impressionism<\/strong> that makes the work one of the <strong>most iconic<\/strong> of Renoir&#8217;s &#8221; <strong>pearly&#8221; period<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">The Pearlescent Period (1890\u20131897) \u2014 The Mature Synthesis<\/h2>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">To put it in context <strong><em>Young Girls at the Piano<\/em><\/strong> within Renoir\u2019s body of work, one must understand the painter\u2019s <strong>stylistic evolution<\/strong>:<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Impressionist period<\/strong> (1869\u20131881) \u2014 vibrant brushstrokes, dissolution of forms, atmospheric light. <strong>Masterpiece<\/strong>: <em>*The Dance at the Moulin de la Galette*<\/em> (1876).<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Ingresque or \u201caustere\u201d period<\/strong> (1881\u20131888)\u2014after his trip to Italy and his <strong>discovery of Raphael<\/strong>, Renoir <strong>rejected Impressionism<\/strong> and <strong>returned to precise drawing<\/strong>, <strong>classical composition<\/strong>, and an <strong>austere color palette<\/strong>. <strong>Masterpiece<\/strong>: <em>The Large Bathers<\/em> (1884\u20131887, Philadelphia Museum of Art).<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>The Pearlescent Period<\/strong> (1890\u20131897)\u2014 <strong>a mature synthesis<\/strong> of <strong>revived classicism<\/strong> and early <strong>Impressionism<\/strong>. <strong>Broader brushstrokes<\/strong> than during the Ingresque period, <strong>iridescent colors<\/strong>, and <strong>female flesh<\/strong> rendered with a characteristic <strong>pearlescent luminosity<\/strong>. <strong>Masterpiece<\/strong>: <strong><em>Young Girls at the Piano<\/em><\/strong> (1892).<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Late or \u201cRed\u201d Period<\/strong> (1897\u20131919)\u2014 <strong>monumental simplification<\/strong>, <strong>explosive colors<\/strong> (reds, oranges, intense yellows), and <strong>a focus exclusively<\/strong> on <strong>female nudes<\/strong> and <strong>family scenes<\/strong>. <strong>Masterpiece<\/strong>: <em>*The Large Bathers* (*The Nymphs*)<\/em> (1918\u20131919, Mus\u00e9e d\u2019Orsay).<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong><em>Young Girls at the Piano<\/em><\/strong> is, in this <strong>chronology<\/strong>, the <strong>emblematic<\/strong> work of the <strong>\u201cpearly\u201d period<\/strong>. It <strong>precisely<\/strong> illustrates the <strong>synthesis<\/strong> Renoir had been seeking since 1888: <\/p>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Drawing<\/strong> has <strong>made a comeback<\/strong> (in the style of Ingres)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>The color palette<\/strong> remains <strong>lyrical<\/strong> (an Impressionist legacy)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>The flesh<\/strong> has that distinctive <strong>pearlescent sheen<\/strong> (new invention)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>The subject matter<\/strong> is <strong>calm<\/strong>, <strong>intimate<\/strong>, and <strong>bourgeois<\/strong> (a concession to the tastes of the time)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">It is, <strong>in fact<\/strong>, one of Renoir\u2019s <strong>best-composed works<\/strong> \u2014 <strong>masterful technique<\/strong>, <strong>a balanced color palette<\/strong>, and <strong>confident line work<\/strong>. No element <strong>is<\/strong> excessive or lacking. It reflects the <strong>artistic maturity<\/strong> of a painter who has <strong>weathered<\/strong> every possible <strong>stylistic crisis<\/strong> and <strong>has finally found<\/strong> a <strong>lasting balance<\/strong>.  <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The term <strong>\u201cpearly period\u201d<\/strong> derives from<strong>the<\/strong> characteristic<strong>pearly appearance<\/strong> of <strong>the female flesh<\/strong> painted by Renoir during those years\u2014 <strong>a milky translucence<\/strong>, <strong>iridescent pinks<\/strong>, and <strong>subtle variations<\/strong> that evoke <strong>mother-of-pearl<\/strong> or <strong>pearls<\/strong>. This <strong>pearlescent effect<\/strong> was achieved technically by <strong>applying multiple glazes<\/strong> over white <strong>preparatory layers<\/strong> \u2014a <strong>time-consuming<\/strong> technique that required <strong>several sessions<\/strong> on the same surface. <\/p>\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Six versions, four signed \u2014 obsessive perfectionism<\/h2>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">One of <strong>the most remarkable aspects<\/strong> of <em>*Young Girls at the Piano*<\/em> is that <strong>Renoir, perpetually dissatisfied<\/strong>, painted <strong>six different versions<\/strong> of it between 1892 and, <strong>most likely, 1893<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>The six documented versions<\/strong>:<\/p>\n\n<ol class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Orsay Version<\/strong> (116 \u00d7 90 cm) \u2014 <strong>officially acquired<\/strong> by the French government for the <strong>Mus\u00e9e du Luxembourg<\/strong> in 1892. <strong>Signed<\/strong>. <strong>Considered the primary version<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n<ol start=\"2\" class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, version<\/strong> (116 \u00d7 81 cm) \u2014 <strong>acquired<\/strong> by the Met in 1937 through <strong>a gift from the Estate of Robert Lehman<\/strong>. <strong>Signed<\/strong>. <strong>This version is very similar<\/strong> to the one at the Mus\u00e9e d&#8217;Orsay but features some <strong>variations<\/strong> in the <strong>rendering of the curtain<\/strong> and the <strong>posture<\/strong> of the standing girl.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n<ol start=\"3\" class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>National Gallery of Art<\/strong>, <strong>Washington, D.C.<\/strong> <strong>version<\/strong>(116 \u00d7 81 cm) \u2014 <strong>donated by Mrs. Pillsbury in 1962<\/strong> (probably; attribution to be verified in the <strong>catalogs raisonn\u00e9<\/strong>). <strong>Signed<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n<ol start=\"4\" class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Private collection version<\/strong> (Sterling and Francine Clark Art Institute Collection, Williamstown, Massachusetts) \u2014 <strong>similar dimensions<\/strong>. <strong>Signed<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n<ol start=\"5\" class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Oil sketch<\/strong> \u2014 <strong>small format<\/strong>, in the collection <strong>of the Mus\u00e9e de l&#8217;Orangerie<\/strong>, Paris (Walter-Guillaume Collection).<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n<ol start=\"6\" class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Pastel<\/strong> \u2014 <strong>same dimensions as the oil versions<\/strong> (116 \u00d7 90 cm). <strong>Private collection<\/strong>. <strong>A preparatory study<\/strong> or <strong>an alternative finished work<\/strong> in a different medium.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Of these six versions<\/strong>, <strong>four are signed by the painter<\/strong> \u2014which means that <strong>Renoir considered them finished<\/strong>. An <strong>unsigned<\/strong> work by Renoir is typically a <strong>study<\/strong> or an <strong>unfinished version<\/strong> that he <strong>did not<\/strong> consider <strong>worthy<\/strong> of being presented as <strong>a final work<\/strong>. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Why six versions?<\/strong> There are several possible <strong>explanations<\/strong>:<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>1. Perfectionism<\/strong>. Renoir was <strong>perpetually dissatisfied<\/strong>. He <strong>would revisit his works<\/strong>, <strong>modify<\/strong> them, <strong>sometimes destroy<\/strong> them, and <strong>start over<\/strong>. This <strong>artistic anxiety<\/strong> is documented by all his <strong>biographers<\/strong> (Jean Renoir, Albert Andr\u00e9, Vollard).   <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>2. The weight of the institutional commission<\/strong>. Renoir knew that this work was <strong>intended for a national collection<\/strong>. The <strong>psychological pressure<\/strong> was considerable. He <strong>made numerous attempts<\/strong> so as not <strong>to disappoint<\/strong>.   <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>3. Demand from art dealers<\/strong>. Once the <strong>official commission<\/strong> was accepted, <strong>several art dealers<\/strong> (notably Paul Durand-Ruel) <strong>commissioned studies<\/strong> from Renoir\u2014they knew that a <strong>work destined for the national museum<\/strong> would have greater <strong>commercial value<\/strong>. Renoir <strong>fulfilled these commissions<\/strong> by producing <strong>several<\/strong> nearly identical <strong>versions<\/strong> intended for <strong>the private market<\/strong>.  <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>4. The practice of \u201crepetitions.\u201d<\/strong> According to Renoir himself (as recounted by his son Jean Renoir), he <strong>viewed painting<\/strong> as a <strong>craft<\/strong> in which creating <strong>multiple versions<\/strong> of the same subject was <strong>normal<\/strong> and <strong>acceptable<\/strong>. For him, painting a subject <strong>multiple times<\/strong> <strong>reinforced his mastery<\/strong> and <strong>improved<\/strong> each successive version.  <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This <strong>multitude of versions<\/strong> now complicates<strong>the study of the work<\/strong>. <strong>Art historians<\/strong> do not <strong>fully<\/strong> agree on the <strong>precise chronology<\/strong> of the <strong>six versions<\/strong> \u2014which one was painted <strong>first<\/strong>, which is <strong>the most accomplished<\/strong>, and which one corresponds <strong>exactly<\/strong> to the one <strong>delivered to the French government<\/strong> in 1892. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The <strong>current consensus<\/strong> identifies the <strong>Orsay version<\/strong> as <strong>the principal work<\/strong> \u2014it was this version that was <strong>purchased by the government<\/strong>, it was this version that entered the <strong>Mus\u00e9e du Luxembourg<\/strong> in 1892, and it is this version that is listed as <strong>the reference version<\/strong> in the <strong>catalogs raisonn\u00e9<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">From Luxembourg to Orsay \u2014 The Canonized Work<\/h2>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The provenance of the <strong>Orsay version<\/strong> of <em>*Young Girls at the Piano*<\/em> is one of <strong>the simplest<\/strong> in the entire Impressionist corpus\u2014the work has <strong>never left<\/strong> French public collections since 1892.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>1892<\/strong>:<strong>The<\/strong> French<strong>Ministry of Fine Arts<\/strong> officially purchased the work from Pierre-Auguste Renoir. It was placed in <strong>the Mus\u00e9e du Luxembourg<\/strong> in Paris, in the gallery dedicated to<strong>contemporary French art<\/strong>. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>1929<\/strong>: As the Mus\u00e9e du Luxembourg <strong>was<\/strong> gradually <strong>phased out<\/strong> as <strong>a venue for exhibiting<\/strong> contemporary art (this role was transferred to <strong>the Mus\u00e9e National d&#8217;Art Moderne<\/strong>, which would be established in 1947), the Impressionist works from the Mus\u00e9e du Luxembourg were <strong>transferred<\/strong> to <strong>the Louvre<\/strong>, specifically to the <strong>Mus\u00e9e du Jeu de Paume<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>1947<\/strong>: <em>*Young Girls at the Piano*<\/em> was exhibited at <strong>the Jeu de Paume museum<\/strong> in the Tuileries, which became <strong>the Museum of<\/strong> Independent <strong>Impressionism<\/strong> starting that year.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>1986<\/strong>: The <strong>Mus\u00e9e d&#8217;Orsay<\/strong> opened. All of the Impressionist works from the Jeu de Paume were <strong>transferred<\/strong> there, including <em>*Young Girls at the Piano<\/em>*. The painting has been on <strong>permanent<\/strong> display in the <strong>gallery dedicated to Renoir<\/strong> ever since, under <strong>inventory number RF 755<\/strong>.  <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>A Unique Place in Art History<\/strong>: &#8221; <em>Young Girls at the Piano<\/em> &#8221; is, <strong>in fact<\/strong>, the <strong>first work by Renoir<\/strong> to enter <strong>French national collections<\/strong> \u2014 <strong>two years before<\/strong> the <strong>Caillebotte bequest<\/strong> (1894\u20131896), which would bring several other Renoirs (including <em>&#8220;The Ball at the Moulin de la Galette<\/em> &#8221; and <em>&#8220;The Swing<\/em>&#8220;).<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Symbolically<\/strong>, the work represents France\u2019s <strong>first institutional recognition<\/strong> of Impressionism\u2014 <strong>a historic milestone<\/strong> in the movement\u2019s <strong>canonization<\/strong>. <strong>All subsequent Renoir works<\/strong> acquired by the government or bequeathed by collectors <strong>would pass<\/strong> through this <strong>door<\/strong> opened by <strong>Mallarm\u00e9<\/strong> and <strong>Roger Marx<\/strong> in 1892.<\/p>\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Posthumous Reputation \u2014 Renoir the Bourgeois or Renoir the Master?<\/h2>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong><em>Young Girls at the Piano<\/em><\/strong> divides modern <strong>art critics<\/strong> along a persistent <strong>fault line<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Critical Reading 1 \u2014 The Controversial \u201cBourgeois\u201d Work<\/strong><\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Several 20th-century art critics viewed <em>*Young Girls at the Piano*<\/em> as a <strong>work of compromise<\/strong> \u2014 <strong>suggesting<\/strong> that Renoir <strong>adapted his style<\/strong> to <strong>bourgeois tastes<\/strong> in order <strong>to please the authorities<\/strong>. The <strong>subject matter<\/strong> (bourgeois young women at the piano) is said to be <strong>conventional<\/strong>, <strong>uncontroversial<\/strong>, and <strong>far removed<\/strong> from the <strong>Impressionist modernity<\/strong> of the 1870s. According to this interpretation, Renoir <strong>betrayed<\/strong> his initial <strong>avant-garde spirit<\/strong> in order to <strong>gain entry into museums<\/strong>.  <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This <strong>critical interpretation<\/strong> is championed in particular by <strong>art historians<\/strong> who are heirs to <strong>formalist modernism<\/strong> (Clement Greenberg, Meyer Schapiro), who emphasize<strong>technical innovation<\/strong> and a <strong>break with tradition<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Critical Reading 2 \u2014 The Mature Synthesis<\/strong><\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Other, more <strong>recent<\/strong> critics, on the contrary, consider <em>*Young Girls at the Piano*<\/em> to be one of Renoir\u2019s <strong>most accomplished works<\/strong>. According to this interpretation, the work <strong>transcends<\/strong> the <strong>dilemma<\/strong> between <strong>classicism and modernity<\/strong> by <strong>synthesizing the<\/strong> two. The <strong>technique<\/strong> is <strong>masterful<\/strong>, the <strong>composition<\/strong> <strong>balanced<\/strong>, and the <strong>intimate emotion<\/strong> <strong>authentic<\/strong>.   The work <strong>proves<\/strong> that <strong>modern painting<\/strong> does not need to <strong>be provocative<\/strong> to exist.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This <strong>critical interpretation<\/strong> is championed by <strong>historians<\/strong> such as <strong>John House<\/strong> (who organized the major retrospective <em>*Renoir in the 20th Century*<\/em> at the National Galleries of the Grand Palais in 2009) and <strong>Anne Distel<\/strong> (author of<strong>the<\/strong> definitive<strong>biography<\/strong> of Renoir, published by <em>Hazan<\/em> in 2009).<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Personal Assessment<\/strong>: <em>*Young Girls at the Piano*<\/em> is, <strong>in fact<\/strong>, one of <strong>the most reproduced works<\/strong> in <strong>Renoir\u2019s late catalog<\/strong>. It appears on <strong>countless<\/strong> posters, postcards, and art history textbooks. It has <strong>been<\/strong> <strong>on continuous<\/strong> <strong>display in museums<\/strong> in France for 130 years. It is regarded as <strong>emblematic<\/strong> of the <strong>\u201cpearly\u201d period<\/strong> in all specialized works.   <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Influence on 20th-century painting<\/strong>: less <strong>directly traceable<\/strong> than that of <em>*Le Bal du Moulin de la Galette*<\/em>, but documented in:<\/p>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Pierre Bonnard<\/strong> (1867\u20131947) \u2014 Intimate Domestic Scenes Featuring Women from the 1900s to the 1940s<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>\u00c9douard Vuillard<\/strong> (1868\u20131940) \u2014 bourgeois interiors, musical scenes, pearlescent color palette<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Henri Matisse<\/strong> (1869\u20131954) \u2014 Early Years (Before Fauvism), Domestic Scenes Inspired by Renoir<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Renoir the bourgeois or Renoir the master?<\/strong> The <strong>honest answer<\/strong> is probably: <strong>both<\/strong>. <em>*Young Girls at the Piano*<\/em> is <strong>both<\/strong> a <strong>concession<\/strong> to institutional taste <strong>and<\/strong> a <strong>technically masterful work<\/strong>. This <strong>ambivalence<\/strong> is what makes it <strong>unique<\/strong> \u2014it is the work in which Renoir <strong>most perfectly achieves<\/strong> a <strong>synthesis<\/strong> between <strong>the avant-garde<\/strong> and <strong>institutional acceptability<\/strong>. <\/p>\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">How to View the Work Today<\/h2>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong><em>Young Girls at the Piano<\/em><\/strong> is housed at the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.musee-orsay.fr\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>Mus\u00e9e d&#8217;Orsay<\/strong><\/a> in Paris. Practical information: <\/p>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Address<\/strong>: 1 rue de la L\u00e9gion d&#8217;Honneur, 75007 Paris<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Subway<\/strong>: Solf\u00e9rino (Line 12) or RER C (Mus\u00e9e d&#8217;Orsay)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Gallery<\/strong>: Currently part of<strong>the retrospective exhibition<\/strong> <strong><em>Renoir and Love: The Joy of Modernity (1865\u20131885)<\/em><\/strong> through <strong>July 19, 2026<\/strong>. After July 19, the work will return to its permanent location in the <strong>Renoir Gallery<\/strong> on the middle level. <\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Inventory number<\/strong>: RF 755 (commissioned by the French government, 1892)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>For <strong>complete pricing and hours<\/strong>: see the article <a href=\"https:\/\/horscadre.paris\/musee-orsay\/\">\u201cMus\u00e9e d&#8217;Orsay\u2014What to See, Hours, Tickets\u201d<\/a> on Hors Cadre<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Also in this gallery<\/strong>:<\/p>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong><em>The Dance at the Moulin de la Galette<\/em><\/strong> (1876)\u2014a signature work of the <strong>Impressionist period<\/strong>, <strong>stylistically contrasting<\/strong> with <em>*Young Girls at the Piano*<\/em><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong><em>The Swing<\/em><\/strong> (1876) \u2014 a <strong>companion<\/strong> piece to <em>*The Ball at the Moulin de la Galette*<\/em><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong><em>Gabrielle with a Rose<\/em><\/strong> (1911) \u2014 Late Renoir, <strong>Red Period<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong><em>The Great Bathers (The Nymphs)<\/em><\/strong> (1918\u20131919) \u2014 a posthumous work<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>To see other versions of the <\/strong><strong><em>Young Girls at the Piano<\/em><\/strong> :<\/p>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.metmuseum.org\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>Metropolitan Museum of Art<\/strong><\/a><strong>, New York<\/strong> \u2014 holds a <strong>signed version<\/strong>, <strong>similar to the one at the Mus\u00e9e d&#8217;Orsay<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.musee-orangerie.fr\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>Mus\u00e9e de l&#8217;Orangerie<\/strong><\/a><strong>, Paris<\/strong> \u2014 holds<strong>the oil sketch<\/strong> (Walter-Guillaume Collection)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>National Gallery of Art, Washington, D.C.<\/strong> \u2014 holds a <strong>signed version<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Sterling and Francine Clark Art Institute, Williamstown<\/strong> \u2014 holds <strong>another signed version<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>To place the work within the &#8220;Nacr\u00e9&#8221; period<\/strong>:<\/p>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Mus\u00e9e de l&#8217;Orangerie<\/strong>, Paris \u2014 <strong><em>Yvonne and Christine Lerolle at the piano<\/em><\/strong> (1897), a later variation on the same theme by Renoir<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Further Reading<\/h2>\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Institutional sources cited<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Mus\u00e9e d&#8217;Orsay<\/strong>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.musee-orsay.fr\/fr\/oeuvres\/jeunes-filles-au-piano-1164\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">official description of *Young Women at the Piano<\/a>*.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Mus\u00e9e de l&#8217;Orangerie<\/strong>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.musee-orangerie.fr\/fr\/oeuvres\/jeunes-filles-au-piano-196508\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">description of the sketch *Girls at the Piano<\/a>*.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Exhibition catalog:<\/strong> <em>*Renoir and Love: The Joy of Modernity (1865\u20131885)<\/em>*, Mus\u00e9e d&#8217;Orsay, 2026.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Primary sources cited<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Pierre-Auguste Renoir<\/strong>, as quoted by his son <strong>Jean Renoir<\/strong> in <strong><em>*Renoir, My Father*<\/em><\/strong>, Paris, 1962.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>St\u00e9phane Mallarm\u00e9<\/strong>, correspondence with Berthe Morisot and Roger Marx.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Leading Modern Studies<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>John Rewald<\/strong>, <em>*A History of Impressionism*<\/em>, Albin Michel, Paris, 1946. <strong>A reference work<\/strong> on the Impressionist movement and the Mallarm\u00e9-Renoir episode.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>John House<\/strong>, <em>*Renoir in the 20th Century*<\/em>, exhibition catalog for <em>*Renoir and Tradition*<\/em>, National Galleries of the Grand Palais, Paris, 2009.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Anne Distel<\/strong>, <em>*Renoir: A Painter, a Life, a Body of<\/em> Work*, Hazan, Paris, 2009. <strong>A definitive biography<\/strong>.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Guy-Patrice Dauberville, Michel Dauberville<\/strong>, <em>*Renoir: A Catalog Raisonn\u00e9 of Paintings, Pastels, Drawings, and Watercolors*<\/em>, 5 volumes, Bernheim-Jeune, Paris, 2007\u20132014. <strong>The definitive catalog raisonn\u00e9<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Institutional Documentation<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.musee-orsay.fr\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>Mus\u00e9e d&#8217;Orsay, Paris<\/strong><\/a> \u2014 institution that has owned it since 1986.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.metmuseum.org\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York<\/strong><\/a> \u2014 has another version.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.musee-orangerie.fr\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>Mus\u00e9e de l&#8217;Orangerie, Paris<\/strong><\/a> \u2014 houses the oil sketch.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>See also on Hors Cadre<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/horscadre.paris\/pierre-auguste-renoir\/\">Pierre-Auguste Renoir \u2014 Joyful Modernity<\/a> \u2014 Portrait of the Artist, A Comprehensive Overview of His Career.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/horscadre.paris\/bal-moulin-galette-renoir\/\">*The Dance at the Moulin de la Galette*\u2014an iconic work of joyful Impressionism<\/a> and a signature piece of the Impressionist period (1876)\u2014stands in stark stylistic contrast to <em>*Young Girls at the Piano*<\/em> (1892).<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/horscadre.paris\/musee-orsay\/\">Mus\u00e9e d&#8217;Orsay \u2014 what to see, hours, tickets<\/a> \u2014 a complete guide to the museum that houses the artwork.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>\u2014 M<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Paris, early 1892. Pierre-Auguste Renoir was fifty-one years old. He had behind him a thirty-year artistic career, four of the eight Impressionist exhibitions, the absolute masterpiece *Le Bal du moulin de la Galette* (1876), the scandal of his Ingresque period (1881\u20131888), and now a mature body of work in which he achieves a synthesis between&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1420,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_uag_custom_page_level_css":"","_kad_blocks_custom_css":"","_kad_blocks_head_custom_js":"","_kad_blocks_body_custom_js":"","_kad_blocks_footer_custom_js":"","_kad_post_transparent":"","_kad_post_title":"","_kad_post_layout":"","_kad_post_sidebar_id":"","_kad_post_content_style":"","_kad_post_vertical_padding":"","_kad_post_feature":"","_kad_post_feature_position":"","_kad_post_header":false,"_kad_post_footer":false,"_kad_post_classname":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[36],"tags":[],"salle":[25],"class_list":["post-1419","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-masterpieces","salle-1851-1900"],"acf":[],"taxonomy_info":{"category":[{"value":36,"label":"Masterpieces"}],"salle":[{"value":25,"label":"1851-1900"}]},"featured_image_src_large":["https:\/\/horscadre.paris\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/jeunes-filles-au-piano-renoir.jpg",744,986,false],"author_info":{"display_name":"admin5462","author_link":"https:\/\/horscadre.paris\/en\/author\/admin5462\/"},"comment_info":0,"category_info":[{"term_id":36,"name":"Masterpieces","slug":"masterpieces","term_group":0,"term_taxonomy_id":36,"taxonomy":"category","description":"","parent":0,"count":81,"filter":"raw","cat_ID":36,"category_count":81,"category_description":"","cat_name":"Masterpieces","category_nicename":"masterpieces","category_parent":0}],"tag_info":false,"uagb_featured_image_src":{"full":["https:\/\/horscadre.paris\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/jeunes-filles-au-piano-renoir.jpg",744,986,false],"thumbnail":["https:\/\/horscadre.paris\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/jeunes-filles-au-piano-renoir-150x150.jpg",150,150,true],"medium":["https:\/\/horscadre.paris\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/jeunes-filles-au-piano-renoir-226x300.jpg",226,300,true],"medium_large":["https:\/\/horscadre.paris\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/jeunes-filles-au-piano-renoir.jpg",744,986,false],"large":["https:\/\/horscadre.paris\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/jeunes-filles-au-piano-renoir.jpg",744,986,false],"1536x1536":["https:\/\/horscadre.paris\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/jeunes-filles-au-piano-renoir.jpg",744,986,false],"2048x2048":["https:\/\/horscadre.paris\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/jeunes-filles-au-piano-renoir.jpg",744,986,false]},"uagb_author_info":{"display_name":"admin5462","author_link":"https:\/\/horscadre.paris\/en\/author\/admin5462\/"},"uagb_comment_info":0,"uagb_excerpt":"Paris, early 1892. Pierre-Auguste Renoir was fifty-one years old. He had behind him a thirty-year artistic career, four of the eight Impressionist exhibitions, the absolute masterpiece *Le Bal du moulin de la Galette* (1876), the scandal of his Ingresque period (1881\u20131888), and now a mature body of work in which he achieves a synthesis between...","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/horscadre.paris\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1419","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/horscadre.paris\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/horscadre.paris\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/horscadre.paris\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/horscadre.paris\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1419"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/horscadre.paris\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1419\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1422,"href":"https:\/\/horscadre.paris\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1419\/revisions\/1422"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/horscadre.paris\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1420"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/horscadre.paris\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1419"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/horscadre.paris\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1419"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/horscadre.paris\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1419"},{"taxonomy":"salle","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/horscadre.paris\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/salle?post=1419"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}