{"id":1415,"date":"2026-06-10T20:59:29","date_gmt":"2026-06-10T18:59:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/horscadre.paris\/the-night-watch-the-revolution-in-group-portraiture\/"},"modified":"2026-09-23T06:59:03","modified_gmt":"2026-09-23T04:59:03","slug":"the-night-watch-the-revolution-in-group-portraiture","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/horscadre.paris\/en\/the-night-watch-the-revolution-in-group-portraiture\/","title":{"rendered":"The Night Watch \u2014 The Revolution in Group Portraiture"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Amsterdam, summer of 1642<\/strong>. A <strong>monumental canvas<\/strong> measuring <strong>363 centimeters high<\/strong> by <strong>437 centimeters wide<\/strong> \u2014 <strong>nearly sixteen square meters<\/strong> of oil painting\u2014was delivered to the <strong>musketeers of the<\/strong> city\u2019s <strong>District II civic militia<\/strong>. The painting was intended to adorn the <strong>great hall of the Kloveniersdoelen<\/strong> (Archers\u2019 Hall), the company\u2019s headquarters. The <strong>painter<\/strong>, <strong>Rembrandt van Rijn<\/strong>, was <strong>thirty-six years old<\/strong> and had been working on the commission for <strong>two years<\/strong>. The <strong>price<\/strong> paid for the painting was <strong>1<\/strong>, <strong>600 florins<\/strong>, a <strong>considerable<\/strong> sum for the time, equivalent to several years\u2019 wages for an Amsterdam laborer.     Each of the <strong>eighteen members<\/strong> of the company depicted contributed <strong>in proportion<\/strong> to their <strong>prominence<\/strong> in the composition.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The <strong>official title<\/strong> of the work, as recorded in <strong>the Kloveniers register<\/strong>, is <strong><em>Officers and Other Carabinier of District II of Amsterdam, Led by Captain Frans Banninck Cocq and Lieutenant Willem van Ruytenburgh<\/em><\/strong>. <strong>But no one calls it that<\/strong>. Since the <strong>18th century<\/strong>, visitors and art historians have referred to the work by a <strong>nickname<\/strong> that has <strong>eclipsed<\/strong> its official title: <strong><em>The Night Watch<\/em><\/strong> (in Dutch: <strong><em>De Nachtwacht<\/em><\/strong>).  A <strong>doubly misleading<\/strong> title\u2014this <strong>is not a night patrol<\/strong> but a <strong>daytime outing<\/strong> by the militia, and the <strong>scene does not take place at night<\/strong> but in <strong>broad daylight<\/strong>. The <strong>historical confusion<\/strong> stems from the <strong>successive layers of varnish<\/strong> applied to the canvas over the centuries, which <strong>gradually darkened<\/strong> it to the point that 18th-century visitors <strong>believed<\/strong> they were looking at a nighttime scene. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The work is, <strong>in fact<\/strong>, <strong>one of the most famous paintings<\/strong> in the entire history of Western painting. More than <strong>2 million visitors<\/strong> a year come to see it at <strong>the Rijksmuseum<\/strong> in Amsterdam, where it has been on permanent display since <strong>1808<\/strong> in the <strong>Gallery of Honor<\/strong> (<em>Eregalerij<\/em>). It is<strong>the<\/strong> museum\u2019s<strong>most-visited work<\/strong>, the <strong>Dutch national masterpiece<\/strong>, and<strong>the<\/strong> globally recognizable<strong>symbol<\/strong> of <strong>the Dutch Golden Age<\/strong>.   It survived <strong>two acts of vandalism<\/strong> (1975, 1990), <strong>being moved to<\/strong> a <strong>safe location during World War II<\/strong>, a <strong>barbaric amputation in 1715<\/strong> that <strong>reduced its original dimensions<\/strong> by about 20%, and is currently the subject of the <strong>largest scientific research project<\/strong> ever conducted on a work of art\u2014the<strong><em>Operation Night Watch<\/em><\/strong> , launched by the Rijksmuseum in <strong>2019<\/strong> and <strong>still ongoing<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This article recounts the <strong>genesis of this pivotal work<\/strong>, the <strong>commission from the Kloveniers<\/strong> of Amsterdam, the <strong>revolution in group portraiture<\/strong> that Rembrandt brought about in 1642,<strong>the documented identities<\/strong> of the eighteen militia members depicted,<strong>the mystery of the radiant blonde girl<\/strong> who may be a <strong>hidden tribute<\/strong> to Saskia van Uylenburgh (Rembrandt\u2019s wife, who died that <strong>same year, 1642<\/strong>),<strong>the barbaric cropping of 1715<\/strong> when the painting would not fit into a room at Amsterdam City Hall, the <strong>two acts of vandalism<\/strong> in the 20th century, and<strong>the<\/strong> current<strong>\u201cOperation Night Watch<\/strong>,\u201d which in recent years has <strong>revealed<\/strong> <strong>secrets hidden<\/strong> for four centuries.<\/p>\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">The Amsterdam Kloveniers Company<\/h2>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">To Understand <strong><em>The Night Watch<\/em><\/strong>, one must understand the <strong>specific context<\/strong> of the <strong>commission<\/strong>. The work is neither a <strong>free invention<\/strong> by Rembrandt, nor an <strong>allegorical scene<\/strong>, nor a <strong>historical portrait<\/strong>. It is, <strong>in fact<\/strong>, a <strong>commercial<\/strong> <strong>group portrait<\/strong> <strong>commissioned directly by<\/strong> a <strong>bourgeois militia<\/strong> in Amsterdam.  <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>The schutterijen<\/strong> were <strong>citizen militia companies<\/strong> that every Dutch city had maintained since the <strong>late Middle Ages<\/strong>. Composed of <strong>amateur citizens<\/strong> (rather <strong>than professional soldiers<\/strong>), they were <strong>responsible for defending the city<\/strong> in the event of an external threat, <strong>maintaining order<\/strong> during <strong>public festivals<\/strong> and <strong>receptions<\/strong>, and <strong>guarding the fortifications<\/strong> in peacetime. In 17th-century Amsterdam, there were <strong>three<\/strong> main <strong>schutterijen<\/strong>, organized according to the <strong>weapons<\/strong> they used:  <\/p>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>The <strong>Voetboogdoelen<\/strong> (crossbowmen) \u2014 ancient weapons falling into disuse<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The <strong>Handboogdoelen<\/strong> (archers) \u2014 a traditional archery group<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The <strong>Kloveniersdoelen<\/strong> (arquebusiers or musketeers) \u2014 <strong>a modern elite corps<\/strong>, firearms<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Each had a <strong>majestic headquarters<\/strong> in the city\u2014a <strong>dedicated building<\/strong> featuring a <strong>large reception hall<\/strong>, <strong>training rooms<\/strong>, a <strong>shooting range<\/strong>, and <strong>banquet facilities<\/strong> for <strong>company meetings<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>The Kloveniersdoelen<\/strong> \u2014the headquarters of <strong>the musketeers<\/strong> \u2014were located on the <strong>Singel in Amsterdam<\/strong>, near what is now <strong>Doelenstraat<\/strong>. The building, constructed in the 1630s, featured a <strong>large reception hall<\/strong> 35 meters long and 8 meters high, intended to host the company\u2019s <strong>official banquets<\/strong> and <strong>visits by dignitaries<\/strong>. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>1638\u20131639<\/strong>: The <strong>Kloveniers<\/strong> Company decided to commission a <strong>series of seven monumental group portraits<\/strong> to <strong>decorate their great hall<\/strong>, each depicting <strong>one of the seven companies<\/strong> that made up the Amsterdam arquebusiers\u2019 corps. <strong>Several<\/strong> Amsterdam <strong>painters<\/strong> were commissioned for this collective project: <strong>Jacob Adriaensz Backer<\/strong>, <strong>Nicolaes Eliasz Pickenoy<\/strong>, <strong>Joachim von Sandrart<\/strong>, <strong>Govert Flinck<\/strong> (a student of Rembrandt), <strong>Bartholomeus van der Helst<\/strong>, and <strong>Rembrandt van Rijn<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Rembrandt<\/strong> was commissioned by the <strong>Second District Company<\/strong>, led by <strong>Captain Frans Banning Cocq<\/strong> (1605\u20131655), <strong>deputy mayor<\/strong> and <strong>future mayor of Amsterdam<\/strong>, and his <strong>lieutenant Willem van Ruytenburgh<\/strong> (c. 1600\u20131652). The commander and his lieutenant were prominent <strong>local figures<\/strong> \u2014city <strong>patricians<\/strong>, <strong>wealthy merchants<\/strong>, and influential <strong>political figures<\/strong>. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Funding system<\/strong>: Each member of the troupe who wished <strong>to appear in the painting<\/strong> paid a fee <strong>proportional<\/strong> to their <strong>visibility<\/strong>. The <strong>figures in the foreground<\/strong>\u2014well-lit and easily identifiable\u2014paid the <strong>highest price<\/strong>. The <strong>figures in the background<\/strong>, partially obscured by those in the foreground, paid <strong>less<\/strong>.   This <strong>pricing structure<\/strong> explains the <strong>exact number of identifiable figures<\/strong>: <strong>eighteen<\/strong> in all, corresponding to <strong>the eighteen men<\/strong> in the company who <strong>paid for their portraits<\/strong>. <strong>All the other figures<\/strong> (the little girl, the minor characters) are <strong>scenic elements added by Rembrandt<\/strong> to <strong>enliven the composition<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Total amount paid<\/strong>: According to the <strong>company&#8217;s records<\/strong> held at the <strong>Amsterdam Municipal Archives<\/strong>, approximately <strong>1,600 florins<\/strong> in total, or <strong>about 100 florins per identifiable member<\/strong>. This was <strong>a considerable sum<\/strong> for the time\u2014the<strong>equivalent<\/strong> of about <strong>three years\u2019<\/strong> wages for an average <strong>Amsterdam laborer<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Time frame<\/strong>: Rembrandt began the painting around <strong>1640\u20131641<\/strong> and <strong>completed<\/strong> it <strong>in 1642<\/strong>. It took him <strong>two years<\/strong> of intense work to complete such a large canvas, all while fulfilling <strong>other commissions<\/strong> in his <strong>thriving studio<\/strong> on Sint Antoniesbreestraat. <\/p>\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">The Painting \u2014 What It Depicts<\/h2>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong><em>The Night Watch<\/em><\/strong> is an <strong>oil on canvas<\/strong> that now measures <strong>363 \u00d7 437 centimeters<\/strong>. <strong>But its original dimensions were larger<\/strong> \u2014approximately <strong>400 \u00d7 500 centimeters<\/strong> before<strong>the barbaric cropping of 1715<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Landscape format<\/strong>, <strong>wide<\/strong>, <strong>monumental<\/strong>. It is one of <strong>the largest canvases<\/strong> painted in 17th-century Holland\u2014only a few works by <strong>Rubens<\/strong>, <strong>Jordaens<\/strong>, and <strong>Van Dyck<\/strong> reach comparable dimensions in contemporary Flemish painting. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Apparent subject<\/strong>: <strong>a company of<\/strong> Amsterdam\u2019s <strong>bourgeois militia marching out<\/strong>, in <strong>broad daylight<\/strong>, from a <strong>building or portico<\/strong> visible in the background. The <strong>eighteen men<\/strong> are depicted <strong>marching<\/strong>, <strong>preparing to fan out<\/strong> into the street for a <strong>mission<\/strong> \u2014a procession, a parade, or a public drill. <strong>No combat<\/strong>, <strong>no war scene<\/strong> \u2014just a <strong>dynamic depiction<\/strong> of a <strong>company on the move<\/strong>. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Composition<\/strong>: Rembrandt organizes the <strong>complex scene<\/strong> around a <strong>triangular structure<\/strong> centered on the <strong>two main figures<\/strong>:<\/p>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>In the center, at the front<\/strong>, <strong>Captain Frans Banning Cocq<\/strong> \u2014a <strong>massive black<\/strong> figure, with <strong>a<\/strong> dazzling <strong>white ruff<\/strong>, <strong>a<\/strong> bright <strong>red sash<\/strong> diagonally across his chest, and <strong>an officer\u2019s baton<\/strong> in his outstretched right hand, <strong>giving the order<\/strong> to march<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>To his right<\/strong>, <strong>standing slightly back<\/strong>, is <strong>Lieutenant Willem van Ruytenburch<\/strong> \u2014wearing <strong>a<\/strong> bright <strong>golden-yellow suit<\/strong>, <strong>an<\/strong> ornate <strong>white sash<\/strong>, and <strong>a halberd<\/strong> resting on his shoulder. His <strong>light-colored silhouette<\/strong> <strong>reflects<\/strong> the light falling on the center of the painting <\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Surrounding the two main characters<\/strong>, in a <strong>variety of lighting and dynamic poses<\/strong>:<\/p>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>On the left<\/strong>, a <strong>musketeer dressed in red<\/strong> is loading his <strong>musket<\/strong> \u2014according to some sources, this is <strong>Jan Aertsz van der Heede<\/strong>. His <strong>dynamic figure<\/strong> <strong>balances<\/strong> the composition on the left <\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Further to the left<\/strong>, <strong>another soldier fires an arquebus<\/strong> into the sky\u2014a cloud of gunpowder smoke, a burst of light<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>To the<\/strong> lieutenant&#8217;s <strong>right<\/strong>, several <strong>arquebusiers<\/strong> are preparing to march, <strong>pikes<\/strong> raised, wearing a variety of <strong>uniforms<\/strong> <\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>In the background<\/strong>, a <strong>crowd of extras<\/strong> can be made out\u2014 <strong>flags<\/strong>, <strong>pennants<\/strong>, <strong>silhouettes<\/strong> blurred in the <strong>golden twilight<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>On the right, in the shadows<\/strong>, a <strong>dog<\/strong> \u2014a detail recently restored by Operation Night Watch<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>The use of light and shadow<\/strong> is <strong>the most technically revolutionary<\/strong> aspect of the painting. Rembrandt <strong>does not illuminate<\/strong> his composition <strong>uniformly<\/strong> \u2014as his contemporaries did in their militia portraits. Instead, he <strong>selects<\/strong>:  <\/p>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Spotlight<\/strong> on the <strong>captain<\/strong>, the <strong>lieutenant<\/strong>, and a <strong>mysterious little blonde girl<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>A golden twilight<\/strong> falls over the <strong>other<\/strong> recognizable <strong>figures<\/strong> <\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Deep shadows<\/strong> on the <strong>background<\/strong> and <strong>secondary characters<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This <strong>hierarchy of light<\/strong> allows Rembrandt to <strong>guide the<\/strong> viewer\u2019s <strong>gaze<\/strong> \u2014the eye is <strong>immediately drawn<\/strong> to the <strong>three luminous<\/strong> central <strong>figures<\/strong>, then <strong>wanders<\/strong> through the <strong>golden half-light<\/strong> to gradually discover the <strong>other figures<\/strong>. <strong>No painter<\/strong> before Rembrandt had dared to employ such <strong>a radical disparity<\/strong> in the <strong>treatment of light<\/strong> in a commissioned group portrait\u2014each figure, who had paid for the portrait, <strong>was theoretically supposed to<\/strong> be <strong>equally visible<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Color palette<\/strong>: Rembrandt\u2019s characteristic <strong>golden-brown<\/strong> tones. <strong>Bright red accents<\/strong> (the captain\u2019s sash, the musketeer\u2019s garment on the left), <strong>luminous yellows<\/strong> (the lieutenant\u2019s uniform), and <strong>dazzling whites<\/strong> (the captain\u2019s ruff, the little girl\u2019s sash). <strong>No<\/strong> <strong>bright<\/strong> <strong>blues<\/strong> or <strong>greens<\/strong> \u2014Rembrandt favors <strong>warm<\/strong>, earthy <strong>tones<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Movement<\/strong>: <strong>Dynamism<\/strong> is everywhere. <strong>No figure is static<\/strong>. <strong>All the characters<\/strong> are <strong>in motion<\/strong> \u2014walking, gesturing, speaking, exchanging glances. <strong>It is this dynamism<\/strong> that radically distinguishes <em>*The Night Watch*<\/em> from all earlier <strong>militia portraits<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">The Group Portrait Revolution<\/h2>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">To appreciate the <strong>revolution Rembrandt brought about<\/strong> in <em>*The Night Watch*<\/em>, one must understand what <strong>militia portraits<\/strong> were like in the <strong>Dutch tradition<\/strong> before 1642.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>The Dutch Group Portrait<\/strong> (in Dutch <strong><em>groepsportret<\/em><\/strong>) is a <strong>distinct genre<\/strong> that emerged in <strong>the 16th century<\/strong> in the United Provinces, closely linked to the <strong>Protestant civic culture<\/strong> of the <strong>Dutch bourgeoisie<\/strong>. Unlike<strong>Catholic religious art<\/strong> (which was prohibited by Dutch Calvinism), Protestant burghers commissioned <strong>group portraits<\/strong> to celebrate their <strong>civic institutions<\/strong> \u2014trade guilds, professional associations, bourgeois militias, and the boards of directors of hospitals and orphanages. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Typical of the era<\/strong>: these portraits are <strong>static<\/strong>, <strong>formal<\/strong>, and <strong>arranged in a row<\/strong>. The figures are <strong>arranged in<\/strong> parallel <strong>rows<\/strong>, <strong>facing the viewer<\/strong>, <strong>evenly lit<\/strong>, each <strong>clearly identifiable<\/strong> by its <strong>fixed position<\/strong> within the composition. <strong>Conventional poses<\/strong>: a hand resting on a <strong>table<\/strong>, <strong>a sword<\/strong> tucked into a <strong>belt<\/strong>, <strong>an open book<\/strong> or <strong>an important document<\/strong>. <strong>No action<\/strong>, <strong>no movement<\/strong>, <strong>no narrative<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>A typical example<\/strong>: <strong><em>Captain Roelof Bicker\u2019s Company<\/em><\/strong> (1639) by <strong>Bartholomeus van der Helst<\/strong> \u2014painted just three years <strong>before<\/strong> <em>*The Night Watch*<\/em>, for the <strong>same Kloveniersdoelen<\/strong>. <strong>Thirty-three figures<\/strong> perfectly <strong>aligned<\/strong> in tight rows, <strong>all looking toward the viewer<\/strong>, with <strong>uniform lighting<\/strong> and <strong>conventional poses<\/strong>. <strong>No sense of movement<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Rembrandt completely breaks with this convention<\/strong>. His <strong>*Night Watch*<\/strong> introduces a <strong>new type of group portrait<\/strong>: <\/p>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Dynamic Composition<\/strong> (Movement, Action, Gestures)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Selective lighting<\/strong> (highlight-shadow contrast, lighting hierarchy)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Implicit narration<\/strong> (the <strong>scene depicts<\/strong> a <strong>militia outing<\/strong>, not just a <strong>group gathering<\/strong>)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Spatial depth<\/strong> (background, perspective, figures in the shadows)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Psychological individualization<\/strong> (each character has their own <strong>expression<\/strong>, <strong>attitude<\/strong>, and <strong>state of mind<\/strong> )<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">As stated in the <strong>official entry<\/strong> on the Histoire-image.org website:<\/p>\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>&#8220;The group portrait Rembrandt painted in 1642 differs from all comparable paintings in that it offers a vision of a society in the making, one that has not yet managed to come together as a single entity.&#8221;<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>\u2014 Histoire-image.org, official analysis of *The Night Watch*<\/em><\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Ambivalent contemporary reception<\/strong>. Several <strong>members of the company<\/strong> reportedly <strong>protested<\/strong> to Rembrandt, <strong>dissatisfied<\/strong> with their <strong>reduced visibility<\/strong> in the composition\u2014why pay <strong>full price<\/strong> if one is <strong>partially shrouded in shadow<\/strong>? No <strong>direct archival records<\/strong> document these protests, but <strong>historical tradition<\/strong> reports <strong>dissatisfaction<\/strong> upon the painting\u2019s delivery.  <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Yet<\/strong> the company ultimately <strong>accepted<\/strong> the painting and<strong>proudly displayed it<\/strong> in the <strong>main hall of the Kloveniersdoelen<\/strong> for <strong>more than seventy years<\/strong>. <strong>They were implicitly aware<\/strong> that they possessed a <strong>masterpiece<\/strong>, despite<strong>the<\/strong> composition&#8217;s<strong>awkwardness<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Frans Banning Cocq and the Militia Men<\/h2>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The <strong>eighteen identifiable figures<\/strong> in the painting were real <strong>Amsterdam burghers<\/strong>, whose<strong>identities<\/strong> are partially documented in the <strong>company&#8217;s records<\/strong> held at the <strong>Amsterdam Archives<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Captain Frans Banninck Cocq<\/strong> (1605\u20131655)\u2014the central figure in the painting. Born into a <strong>patrician family<\/strong> in Amsterdam, he was <strong>deputy burgomaster<\/strong> of the city (the modern equivalent of deputy mayor) at the time the painting was commissioned, and he would go on to serve as <strong>burgomaster<\/strong> (mayor) of Amsterdam on several occasions between 1650 and 1655. <strong>A wealthy merchant<\/strong>, married to an heiress, and owner of <strong>several rural estates<\/strong> in the province of <strong>Holland<\/strong>. His <strong>dark figure<\/strong> in the center of the painting, with <strong>a white ruff<\/strong> and <strong>red sash<\/strong>, is<strong>a<\/strong> world-renowned<strong>image<\/strong>. <strong>Height<\/strong>: a tall, slender man, according to contemporary sources. <strong>Face<\/strong>: high forehead, neatly trimmed beard, light-colored eyes.  <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Lieutenant Willem van Ruytenburgh<\/strong> (c. 1600\u20131652)\u2014second in command, to the captain\u2019s right. A member of the <strong>rural nobility<\/strong> from the Amsterdam area (Lord of <strong>Vlaardingen<\/strong> and <strong>Vlaardinger-Ambacht<\/strong>). Elaborately <strong>embroidered golden-yellow uniform<\/strong>, <strong>white<\/strong> embroidered <strong>sash<\/strong>, <strong>halberd<\/strong> slung over his shoulder. <strong>A symbol<\/strong> of the <strong>patrician upper middle class<\/strong> that led the militia. <strong>He died<\/strong> prematurely at age 52 from undocumented <strong>complications<\/strong>. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Jan Aertsz van der Heede<\/strong> \u2014 according to institutional sources, <strong>a musketeer<\/strong> dressed in <strong>red<\/strong> to the captain\u2019s left, <strong>loading his weapon<\/strong>. <strong>An active member<\/strong> of the company and <strong>a merchant<\/strong> in downtown Amsterdam.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>The other identifiable musketeers<\/strong> are recorded in the <strong>registers<\/strong>, but their <strong>exact identities<\/strong> remain a subject of debate among historians. According to the preserved archives: <\/p>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Jacob Dirksz de Roy<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Walich Schellingwou<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Jan Brugman<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Claes van Cruysbergen<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Reijnier Janszen Engelen<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Barent Harmansen<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Jacob Banning<\/strong> (presumably the captain&#8217;s relative)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>And several others whose names appear on the company&#8217;s <strong>payroll lists<\/strong> <\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Precise <strong>visual identifications<\/strong> of each individual in the painting remain <strong>incomplete<\/strong> \u2014Rembrandt <strong>combined<\/strong> several <strong>models<\/strong> into certain figures and <strong>invited<\/strong> several unpaid <strong>extras<\/strong> to <strong>enliven<\/strong> the composition. A total of <strong>about thirty people<\/strong> appear in the painting, although <strong>only eighteen<\/strong> were paid.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>A valuable historical detail<\/strong>: on the <strong>shield<\/strong> above the portico, in the back on the left, Rembrandt <strong>painted the names<\/strong> of the <strong>eighteen paying members<\/strong> of the company. This <strong>handwritten list (which<\/strong> is very difficult to read today without magnification) serves as the portrait\u2019s <strong>collective signature<\/strong> \u2014 <strong>a certification<\/strong> that <strong>all the paying members<\/strong> are <strong>indeed represented<\/strong> in the painting, even those whom<strong>the lighting<\/strong> makes less visible. <\/p>\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">The Mysterious Blonde Girl<\/h2>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In <strong>the center-left<\/strong> of the painting, behind the musketeer in red, a <strong>radiant little blonde girl<\/strong> crosses the scene. <strong>Dressed in a<\/strong> bright <strong>pale yellow dress<\/strong>, <strong>she is illuminated just like the captain and the lieutenant<\/strong> (and thus bathed in the <strong>same privileged light<\/strong> as the two main characters), she wears a <strong>dead rooster<\/strong> (or a <strong>white hen<\/strong>) hanging from her <strong>belt<\/strong> and <strong>holds<\/strong> a ritual <strong>weapon<\/strong> or a <strong>small horn<\/strong> in her right hand. Her <strong>gaze<\/strong> is directed toward the viewer\u2014she <strong>addresses<\/strong> the viewer directly. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>This little girl has puzzled art historians for 380 years<\/strong>. She is <strong>clearly not a paying member<\/strong> of the militia ( <strong>all of<\/strong> whom are <strong>adult men<\/strong>). <strong>Nor is<\/strong> she <strong>a neutral extra<\/strong> \u2014the <strong>brilliant light<\/strong> bathing her gives her <strong>major compositional importance<\/strong>, on par with the two official protagonists.  <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Several theories<\/strong> have been competing for the past four centuries:<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>1. Heraldic allegory of the Kloveniers<\/strong>. The <strong>dead rooster<\/strong> hanging from his belt evokes<strong>the<\/strong> company\u2019s<strong>emblem<\/strong>. The Old Dutch word <strong><em>kloven<\/em><\/strong> (from which <strong>\u201cKloveniers\u201d<\/strong> is derived) means <strong>\u201cclaw\u201d<\/strong> \u2014a <strong>heraldic<\/strong> emblem associated with <strong>the rooster<\/strong> (the bird with fierce claws). The girl is thus a <strong>symbolic allegory<\/strong> of the <strong>company<\/strong> itself, <strong>personified<\/strong> as a <strong>young girl bearing the emblem<\/strong>.   <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>2. Allegory of Victory or Civic Glory<\/strong>. Baroque iconographic tradition: <strong>military<\/strong> and <strong>civic<\/strong> <strong>virtues<\/strong> are personified as <strong>young<\/strong> allegorical <strong>women<\/strong>. The young girl is believed to be a <strong>symbolic representation<\/strong> of the militia\u2019s <strong>mission<\/strong> \u2014to defend the city.  <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>3. A hidden tribute to Saskia van Uylenburgh<\/strong>. <strong>Saskia<\/strong>, <strong>Rembrandt\u2019s first wife<\/strong>, <strong>died on June 14, 1642<\/strong>, from complications related to the birth of their son Titus. <em>*The Night Watch*<\/em> was <strong>completed that same year<\/strong>. Several recent art historians (notably the analysis by Histoire-image.org) have <strong>noted<\/strong> the <strong>resemblance<\/strong> between the girl in the painting and <strong>Saskia\u2019s face<\/strong> in Rembrandt\u2019s other works. <strong>The painter\u2019s gaze<\/strong> in the painting (Rembrandt painted a <strong>partial eye<\/strong> that can be glimpsed over the shoulder of a standard-bearer on the right) <strong>seems to be fixed<\/strong> precisely <strong>on<\/strong> the little girl. <strong>A hidden tribute to her<\/strong>?  <strong>The romantic hypothesis<\/strong> remains <strong>unproven<\/strong> but <strong>appealing<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>4. A simple, anonymous extra<\/strong>. A <strong>prosaic<\/strong> hypothesis: Rembrandt may have <strong>included<\/strong> a <strong>female figure<\/strong> simply to <strong>balance<\/strong> the male composition and <strong>add<\/strong> a <strong>touch of light<\/strong> to the center of the painting. <strong>No symbolism<\/strong>, <strong>no identity<\/strong>. This hypothesis, <strong>advocated<\/strong> by some <strong>positivist<\/strong> historians, <strong>reduces<\/strong> the girl to a <strong>formal element<\/strong> with no narrative significance.  <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>The debate remains open<\/strong>. <strong>Recent research<\/strong> by<strong>Operation Night Watch<\/strong> (since 2019) has <strong>not yet<\/strong> definitively <strong>settled<\/strong> the issue. The company\u2019s <strong>records<\/strong> do not <strong>mention any young girls<\/strong> among the paying customers or the official models.<strong>The<\/strong> model\u2019s<strong>true identity<\/strong> (if there was one) remains <strong>unknown<\/strong>.   <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>What is certain<\/strong> is that the girl <strong>occupies a central position<\/strong> in the painting, <strong>is bathed<\/strong> in the <strong>brightest light<\/strong>, and <strong>represents<\/strong> one of the most debated <strong>iconographic mysteries<\/strong> in the entire history of Western painting.<\/p>\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">1642 \u2014 A Year of Triumph and Mourning<\/h2>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The year <strong>1642<\/strong> in Rembrandt&#8217;s life was, <strong>at the same time<\/strong>, a year of <strong>great artistic triumph<\/strong> and <strong>personal tragedy<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Artistic Triumph<\/strong>: <strong><em>The Night Watch<\/em><\/strong> is <strong>delivered<\/strong> and <strong>installed<\/strong> in the <strong>main hall of the Kloveniersdoelen<\/strong>. It is Rembrandt\u2019s <strong>masterpiece<\/strong> from his <strong>mature period<\/strong>. He is <strong>36 years<\/strong> old, runs the <strong>leading studio in Amsterdam<\/strong>, trains <strong>dozens of students<\/strong>, owns the <strong>largest private home<\/strong> in the Jewish quarter (Sint Antoniesbreestraat), and commands the <strong>highest prices<\/strong> on the Dutch art market.  <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Personal tragedy<\/strong>: On <strong>June 14, 1642<\/strong>, <strong>Saskia van Uylenburgh<\/strong> died at <strong>the age of thirty<\/strong> from <strong>complications<\/strong> related to the birth of their son <strong>Titus<\/strong> <strong>nine months earlier<\/strong>. Saskia, <strong>a Frisian patrician<\/strong> and <strong>daughter of the mayor of Leeuwarden<\/strong>, had been Rembrandt\u2019s <strong>muse<\/strong> and <strong>favorite model<\/strong> for eight years; she died of either a <strong>puerperal infection<\/strong> or poorly treated <strong>tuberculosis<\/strong> \u2014a medical diagnosis that cannot be established with certainty in retrospect.  She left <strong>Rembrandt a widower<\/strong>, with an <strong>eight-month-old son<\/strong> and <strong>three children from a previous marriage who had died in infancy<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>The coincidence<\/strong> of<strong>the completion<\/strong> of <em>*The Night Watch*<\/em> and <strong>Saskia\u2019s death<\/strong> <strong>had a profound impact on<\/strong> Rembrandt. Several modern <strong>biographers<\/strong> (Schama 2002, Bikker 2019) consider <strong>1642 to be a pivotal year<\/strong> in the painter\u2019s life\u2014 <strong>a turning point<\/strong> between the <strong>triumphant<\/strong> Amsterdam <strong>decade<\/strong> (1631\u20131642) and the <strong>gradual decline<\/strong> that would lead to his <strong>bankruptcy in 1656<\/strong>. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>The theory that<\/strong> the face of the radiant <strong>blonde girl<\/strong> is <strong>a hidden tribute<\/strong> to Saskia finds, <strong>within this timeline<\/strong>, a <strong>possible emotional basis<\/strong>. Rembrandt may have <strong>completed<\/strong> his painting <strong>after<\/strong> Saskia\u2019s <strong>death<\/strong>, <strong>incorporating<\/strong> into the composition a <strong>cryptic portrait<\/strong> of his late wife\u2014a sort of <strong>pictorial mourning<\/strong> in a <strong>public work<\/strong>. <strong>This hypothesis is unproven<\/strong> but <strong>chronologically consistent<\/strong>. <\/p>\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Why \u201cThe Night Watch\u201d? The Age-Old Misinterpretation <\/h2>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">One of <strong>the most intriguing mysteries<\/strong> surrounding the painting is its <strong>nickname<\/strong> \u2014 <strong><em>The Night Watch<\/em><\/strong>. <strong>In fact<\/strong>, it is <strong>doubly incorrect<\/strong>: it is neither a <strong>round dance<\/strong> nor a <strong>night scene<\/strong>. <strong>Why, then, this title<\/strong>? <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>The painting dates from 1642<\/strong>. No contemporary 17th-century source refers to it as <strong><em>*The Night Watch*<\/em><\/strong>. The Kloveniers\u2019 <strong>records<\/strong>, the company\u2019s <strong>archives<\/strong>, and <strong>references<\/strong> by 17th-century biographers (Joachim von Sandrart 1675, Filippo Baldinucci 1681, Arnold Houbraken 1718) refer to the <strong>\u201cportrait of Captain Banninck Cocq\u201d<\/strong> or the <strong>\u201cCompany\u2019s outing.\u201d<\/strong> There is <strong>no mention<\/strong> of a <strong>patrol<\/strong> or of <strong>nighttime<\/strong>.  <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>In the 18th century<\/strong>, the situation changed. The painting was <strong>moved in 1715<\/strong> from the Kloveniersdoelen to<strong>Amsterdam City Hall<\/strong>. Over the course of decades, it accumulated <strong>successive layers<\/strong> of <strong>varnish<\/strong> \u2014transparent <strong>resin<\/strong> coatings applied to <strong>protect<\/strong> the painting, which <strong>gradually browned<\/strong> upon contact with <strong>candle smoke<\/strong>, <strong>household fumes<\/strong>, and <strong>sunlight<\/strong>. By the early 19th century, the <strong>varnish<\/strong> had become <strong>thick<\/strong>, <strong>browned<\/strong>, and <strong>opaque<\/strong>.    The painting&#8217;s original bright <strong>light<\/strong> has <strong>been obscured<\/strong> by a dark <strong>film<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Around<\/strong> <strong>1797<\/strong>, the title <strong><em>De Nachtwacht<\/em><\/strong> (&#8220;The Night Watch&#8221;) appeared in a catalog from Amsterdam City Hall. <strong>Visitors<\/strong>, looking at the painting <strong>darkened<\/strong> by varnish, <strong>interpreted<\/strong> the <strong>golden twilight<\/strong> as a <strong>nocturnal scene<\/strong>. The <strong>company<\/strong> appears to <strong>be patrolling<\/strong> a <strong>dark street<\/strong>, <strong>lit<\/strong> only by the <strong>lanterns<\/strong> the soldiers would be carrying.  <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>The title spread rapidly<\/strong>. During the <strong>19th century<\/strong>, the work became <strong>known worldwide<\/strong> by this <strong>nickname<\/strong>, which permanently <strong>overshadowed<\/strong> the <strong>official title<\/strong> documented in the archives. No serious <strong>art historian<\/strong> seriously <strong>disputes<\/strong> the title\u2014it has become <strong>part of<\/strong> European cultural <strong>folklore<\/strong>.  <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>20th century<\/strong>: <strong>Successive cleanings<\/strong> (1851, 1889, 1922, 1946\u20131947, 1975\u20131976 following acts of vandalism) <strong>gradually removed<\/strong> the thick layers of varnish. The painting <strong>regained<\/strong> its <strong>original colors<\/strong> \u2014 <strong>vibrant light<\/strong>, <strong>a golden palette<\/strong>, and <strong>a clearly daytime scene<\/strong>. But the <strong>traditional title<\/strong> persists, <strong>out of<\/strong> cultural <strong>habit<\/strong>.  <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Today, the <strong>Rijksmuseum<\/strong> itself acknowledges<strong>the historical error<\/strong> but <strong>retains<\/strong> the nickname in its <strong>public presentations<\/strong>: <strong><em>Officers and other constables of Amsterdam\u2019s Second District, led by Captain Frans Banninck Cocq and Lieutenant Willem van Ruytenburgh, known as \u201cThe Night Watch\u201d<\/em><\/strong>. <strong>Recognition<\/strong> of the <strong>dual title<\/strong> \u2014official and popular.<\/p>\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">1715 \u2014 The Barbaric Amputation<\/h2>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">One of <strong>the most remarkable episodes<\/strong> in the painting\u2019s physical history is its <strong>forced trimming in 1715<\/strong> \u2014an event that <strong>permanently reduced<\/strong> its <strong>original dimensions<\/strong> by about <strong>20 percent.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>1715<\/strong>: The <strong>Amsterdam city government<\/strong> decided to <strong>move<\/strong> <strong><em>&#8220;The Night Watch&#8221;<\/em><\/strong> from the <strong>main hall of the Kloveniersdoelen<\/strong> to<strong>Amsterdam City Hall<\/strong> (now <strong>the Royal Palace of Amsterdam<\/strong>, on Dam Square). <strong>The Kloveniersdoelen building<\/strong> had become <strong>dilapidated<\/strong>, its historical <strong>military function<\/strong> had faded, and the <strong>city council<\/strong> wanted <strong>to reclaim<\/strong> the <strong>masterpiece<\/strong> to display it in a <strong>more prestigious location<\/strong>. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>A major practical problem<\/strong>: the <strong>room in City Hall<\/strong> designated to house the painting is <strong>too small<\/strong>. The painting, at its <strong>original dimensions<\/strong> of approximately <strong>400 \u00d7 500 centimeters<\/strong>, <strong>does not fit<\/strong> between the <strong>two doors<\/strong> that frame the wall where it is to be hung. It is <strong>about 50 to 70 centimeters<\/strong> too wide.  <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>The decision<\/strong> made by the <strong>city officials<\/strong> is <strong>astonishingly cavalier<\/strong>: <strong>to cut the painting<\/strong> so that it would fit the <strong>size of the room<\/strong>. <strong>No other solution<\/strong> was considered\u2014neither enlarging the room, nor finding another exhibition space, nor leaving the painting at the Kloveniersdoelen.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>The cuts were made in 1715<\/strong>. The cut <strong>strips<\/strong> are <strong>mainly<\/strong>: <\/p>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>On the left<\/strong>: approximately <strong>60\u201365 cm<\/strong> wide (the majority of the cropping) \u2014 Rembrandt had painted <strong>two additional figures<\/strong> and a detailed <strong>architectural background<\/strong> on the left. The <strong>musketeer<\/strong> who is <strong>now<\/strong> firing <strong>at the far left<\/strong> of the painting was <strong>more central<\/strong> in the original composition <\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Top<\/strong>: approximately <strong>15\u201320 cm<\/strong> \u2014 a <strong>portion of the sky<\/strong> and the <strong>upper architectural structure<\/strong> has been cropped out<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>At the bottom<\/strong>: approximately <strong>15 cm<\/strong> \u2014 a cut in the <strong>lower part<\/strong> of the <strong>pavement<\/strong> on which the company is walking<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>On the right<\/strong>: approximately <strong>5\u201310 cm<\/strong> \u2014 a minor cut through an <strong>architectural element<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>The cut-off fragments are lost<\/strong>. No <strong>physical trace<\/strong> of <strong>the removed strips<\/strong> remains\u2014they were <strong>destroyed<\/strong>, <strong>reused<\/strong> as <strong>patchwork<\/strong> for other works, or simply <strong>thrown<\/strong> into the <strong>trash bins<\/strong> at City Hall. <strong>This<\/strong> serves as <strong>a historical testament<\/strong> to the <strong>attitude<\/strong> toward 18th-century <strong>artistic heritage<\/strong> \u2014at the time, a <strong>work of art<\/strong> was still considered a <strong>decorative object<\/strong> to <strong>be adapted to the needs<\/strong> of its <strong>owner<\/strong>, not an <strong>untouchable masterpiece<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Modern reconstruction based on a copy<\/strong>. Fortunately, a <strong>complete copy<\/strong> of the painting exists <strong>from before it was cut down<\/strong> \u2014painted by <strong>Gerrit Lundens<\/strong> (probably around 1642\u20131655, in Rembrandt\u2019s own studio or shortly thereafter). This <strong>smaller-scale<\/strong> <strong>copy<\/strong>(approximately 66 \u00d7 85 cm), <strong>faithful in every detail<\/strong>, is housed at the <strong>National Gallery in London<\/strong>. <strong>Thanks to this copy<\/strong>, we know <strong>precisely<\/strong> what the painting <strong>depicted<\/strong> before the 1715 cropping:  <\/p>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Two more characters<\/strong> on the left<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>A<\/strong> more complex <strong>architectural background<\/strong> (arches, windows)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>More depth<\/strong> in the composition<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>The 1715 amputation<\/strong> is, <strong>in fact<\/strong>,<strong>one of the<\/strong> most <strong>regrettable<\/strong><strong>acts of administrative vandalism<\/strong> in the entire history of Western art. It <strong>irrevocably diminished<\/strong> the original <strong>monumentality<\/strong> of the masterpiece. <\/p>\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">From Vandalism to Operation Night Watch<\/h2>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Material History of <strong><em>*The Night Watch*<\/em><\/strong> since the 20th century has been marked by <strong>two acts of vandalism<\/strong>, its <strong>relocation to a safe location during the war<\/strong>, and the <strong>largest scientific research project<\/strong> ever conducted on a work of art.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>World War II (1939\u20131945)<\/strong>. At <strong>the start of the conflict<\/strong>, in September 1939, the <strong>Rijksmuseum<\/strong> took the <strong>precautionary measure<\/strong> of<strong>evacuating<\/strong> its most valuable works to <strong>protect<\/strong> them from bombing. <strong><em>The Night Watch<\/em><\/strong> was <strong>rolled up<\/strong> (with <strong>extreme care<\/strong>, given its size) and <strong>transported<\/strong> to <strong>Sint-Pietersberg<\/strong> near <strong>Maastricht<\/strong>, where it was <strong>hidden<\/strong> in a <strong>tunnel<\/strong> in <strong>the<\/strong> former <strong>underground quarry<\/strong>. It remained <strong>in storage<\/strong> there for <strong>six years<\/strong>, under difficult <strong>storage conditions<\/strong> (humidity, fluctuating temperatures). <strong>It was returned to the museum<\/strong> in <strong>1945<\/strong> after the liberation of the Netherlands. <strong>Minor restoration<\/strong> was necessary following this prolonged storage.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>September 14, 1975<\/strong>: <strong>First attempt at vandalism<\/strong>. A <strong>Dutch man<\/strong> named <strong>Wilhelmus de Rijk<\/strong> (mentally unstable, <strong>an<\/strong> unemployed <strong>schoolteacher<\/strong> ) <strong>entered<\/strong> the room where <em>*The Night Watch*<\/em> was <strong>on<\/strong> display, pulled a <strong>kitchen knife<\/strong> hidden under his coat, and <strong>slashed the painting<\/strong> <strong>several times<\/strong>. <strong>Twelve knife wounds<\/strong> were inflicted on the <strong>central part<\/strong> of the composition, mainly on the <strong>figure of Captain Banninck Cocq<\/strong>. <strong>Deep gashes<\/strong> <strong>cut through the canvas<\/strong>. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>A spectacular restoration<\/strong>. The Rijksmuseum team, led by <strong>chief conservator Luitsen Kuiper<\/strong>, is carrying out a <strong>restoration project<\/strong> that <strong>will last one year<\/strong>.  The painting has been <strong>restored<\/strong>: the <strong>fragments<\/strong> of canvas <strong>have been reattached<\/strong> to <strong>the back<\/strong> using a <strong>new backing<\/strong>, and the <strong>tears<\/strong> <strong>have been filled in<\/strong> with meticulous <strong>inpainting<\/strong>. <strong>The restoration was controversial<\/strong> but <strong>successful<\/strong> \u2014the <strong>traces<\/strong> of the cuts are <strong>invisible<\/strong> to the naked eye after the restoration, except under <strong>special lighting<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Wilhelmus de Rijk<\/strong> was put on trial, found <strong>not criminally responsible<\/strong>, and <strong>committed<\/strong> to a psychiatric hospital. <strong>He committed suicide<\/strong> while institutionalized in April 1976, shortly after the events.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>April 6, 1990<\/strong>: <strong>Second attempt at vandalism<\/strong>. Another mentally unstable <strong>man<\/strong> <strong>threw sulfuric acid<\/strong> on the painting. Fortunately, the <strong>varnish<\/strong> recently applied after the 1975 restoration <strong>protected<\/strong> the underlying <strong>paint layer<\/strong>. <strong>A few areas<\/strong> sustained <strong>superficial damage<\/strong>, but the <strong>masterpiece<\/strong> was saved. Rapid <strong>restoration<\/strong> was carried out on site in the <strong>weeks<\/strong> that followed.  <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>After 1990<\/strong>: <strong>a major increase<\/strong> in <strong>security<\/strong>. The painting is now <strong>protected<\/strong> by <strong>bulletproof glass<\/strong>, <strong>motion-detection<\/strong> <strong>systems<\/strong>, and <strong>security guards<\/strong> who are stationed in the <strong>Gallery of Honor<\/strong> at all times when the museum is open to the public. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>2019 \u2014 Operation Night Watch<\/strong>. The Rijksmuseum launches the <strong>largest scientific research project<\/strong> ever conducted on a <strong>single work of art<\/strong>. <strong>Objectives<\/strong>: <\/p>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Comprehensive analysis<\/strong> of the material composition (pigments, techniques, supports)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Ultra-high-resolution <strong>multispectral imaging<\/strong> <\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Gentle restoration<\/strong> of damaged areas (particularly the <strong>dog<\/strong> in the right-hand corner, which has been worn away by repeated cleanings)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Digital reconstruction<\/strong> of <strong>the limbs amputated<\/strong> in 1715<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Public Outreach<\/strong>: The <strong>restoration<\/strong> is being carried out in a <strong>glass-enclosed room<\/strong> <strong>within the Gallery of Honor<\/strong> itself, allowing <strong>visitors<\/strong> to<strong>observe the process<\/strong> during their visit<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Spectacular discoveries<\/strong> since 2019:<\/p>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>2020<\/strong>: Confirmation that Rembrandt<strong>used<\/strong> <strong>lead-tin<\/strong> for his <strong>luminous yellows<\/strong> (an unusual technique he also used for skin tones)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>2021<\/strong>: <strong>Reconstruction using artificial intelligence<\/strong> of <strong>the<\/strong> <strong>parts that were cut off<\/strong> in 1715, <strong>based on Gerrit Lundens\u2019 copy<\/strong> and a machine-learning <strong>algorithm<\/strong> trained on<strong>Rembrandt\u2019s entire body of work<\/strong>. Public presentation of the <strong>fully reconstructed version<\/strong> from April through October 2021 <\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>2024\u20132025<\/strong>: <strong>Restoration<\/strong> of <strong>the dog that had been overlooked<\/strong> in the <strong>lower right corner<\/strong>. The animal, <strong>worn down<\/strong> by <strong>successive cleanings<\/strong> over the preceding centuries, had <strong>lost<\/strong> its original <strong>colors<\/strong>. <strong>Gentle restoration<\/strong> was carried out using carefully documented <strong>color reintegration techniques<\/strong>. <strong>The dog has regained<\/strong> its <strong>original hues<\/strong> \u2014 <strong>a<\/strong> typical Dutch <strong>yellow-brown dog<\/strong> of the period. <\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Operation Night Watch<\/strong> is <strong>still underway<\/strong> as of this writing (June 2026). <strong>It is scheduled to continue until around 2027<\/strong>. New <strong>discoveries<\/strong> continue to transform our <strong>understanding<\/strong> of this masterpiece. <\/p>\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">How to View the Work Today<\/h2>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong><em>*The Night Watch*<\/em><\/strong> is housed at the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.rijksmuseum.nl\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>Rijksmuseum<\/strong><\/a> in Amsterdam. Practical information: <\/p>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Address<\/strong>: Museumstraat 1, 1071 XX Amsterdam, Netherlands<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Tram<\/strong>: Line 2 or 12, <strong>Rijksmuseum<\/strong> stop<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Gallery<\/strong>: <strong><em>Eregalerij<\/em><\/strong> (Gallery of Honor), main level\u2014at the <strong>far<\/strong> end of the gallery, <strong>the centerpiece<\/strong> of the collection<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Hours<\/strong>: Daily, 9 a.m.\u20135 p.m.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Price<\/strong>: approximately \u20ac22.50 full price (adults); free for those under 18<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Reservations<\/strong>: <strong>Strongly recommended<\/strong> online; limited availability during peak season<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Important note<\/strong>: During the<strong><em>Operation Night Watch<\/em><\/strong> (until around 2027), the <strong>glass-enclosed<\/strong> restoration <strong>chamber<\/strong> is <strong>set up<\/strong> in the <strong>Gallery of Honor<\/strong>. <strong>Visitors<\/strong> can see both the <strong>painting<\/strong> and the <strong>restorers at work<\/strong>. This is a spectacle unique in the world\u2014it is <strong>rare for<\/strong> the public to be able to <strong>observe<\/strong> the <strong>scientific restoration<\/strong> of a masterpiece <strong>in real time<\/strong>.  <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Also worth seeing in the same museum<\/strong>:<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Rijksmuseum houses the <strong>world&#8217;s largest collection<\/strong> of Rembrandt <strong>works<\/strong> \u2014 <strong>more than 400 pieces<\/strong>, including paintings, drawings, and etchings. Alongside <em>*The Night Watch*<\/em>: <\/p>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong><em>The Officers of the Clothmakers&#8217; Guild<\/em><\/strong> (1662) \u2014 Rembrandt\u2019s last great group portrait<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong><em>Portrait of Maria Trip<\/em><\/strong> (1639)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Several <strong>self-portraits<\/strong>, including <strong><em>Self-Portrait at Age 22<\/em><\/strong> (1628)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Numerous <strong>etchings<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Major Works of<strong>the Dutch Golden Age<\/strong>: Vermeer (<strong><em>The Milkmaid<\/em><\/strong>, <strong><em>The Love Letter<\/em><\/strong>), Frans Hals, Jan Steen, Gerard ter Borch, Pieter de Hooch<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>In Amsterdam, additional sights<\/strong>:<\/p>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.rembrandthuis.nl\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>Rembrandt House<\/strong><\/a> (Jodenbreestraat 4) \u2014 <strong>the<\/strong> painter\u2019s <strong>former home<\/strong> from 1639 to 1656, now a museum. A faithful reconstruction of his studio, a collection of<strong>etchings<\/strong>, and 17th-century <strong>artifacts<\/strong>. A must-see destination, just a 15-minute walk from the Rijksmuseum  <\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Westerkerk<\/strong> (Prinsengracht 281) \u2014 <strong>the church<\/strong> where Rembrandt was buried in 1669 in a <strong>rented grave<\/strong> (which could not be preserved; see the article on Rembrandt&#8217;s portrait)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>In Paris<\/strong>:<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The <strong>Louvre Museum<\/strong> has several <strong>major Rembrandt works<\/strong> in its collection, but <strong>no version of<\/strong> <em>*The Night Watch<\/em>*. To see the painting, <strong>you have to go to Amsterdam<\/strong>. <\/p>\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Further Reading<\/h2>\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Institutional sources cited<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Rijksmuseum Amsterdam<\/strong>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.rijksmuseum.nl\/fr\/presse\/lancement-de-l-op-ration-ronde-de-nuit-au-rijksmuseum\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">official page for *The Night Watch* and *Operation Night Watch<\/a>*.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Larousse<\/strong>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.larousse.fr\/encyclopedie\/oeuvre\/la_Ronde_de_nuit\/141453\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">official entry on *The Night Watch<\/a>*.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Histoire-image.org<\/strong>, <a href=\"https:\/\/histoire-image.org\/etudes\/compagnie-frans-banning-cocq-willem-van-ruytenburch-dite-ronde-nuit\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">a comprehensive analysis of the painting<\/a>.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Encyclop\u00e6dia Universalis<\/strong>, article <em>\u201cRembrandt van Rijn.\u201d<\/em><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Primary sources cited<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Amsterdam Municipal Archives<\/strong> \u2014 Kloveniers Registers (1638\u20131715).<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Gerrit Lundens<\/strong> (c. 1642\u20131655), copy of <em>*The Night Watch*<\/em>, National Gallery, London.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Eug\u00e8ne Fromentin<\/strong>, <em>*The Masters of the<\/em> Past*, Paris, 1876.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Leading Modern Studies<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Bob Haak<\/strong>, <em>*Rembrandt: His Life, His Work, His Times*<\/em>, Citadelles &amp; Mazenod, Paris, 1984.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Jonathan Bikker<\/strong>, <em>*Rembrandt: Biography of a Rebel*<\/em>, Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam, 2019. <strong>A recent biography<\/strong> related to Operation Night Watch.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Simon Schama<\/strong>, <em>*The Face of Rembrandt*<\/em>, Seuil, Paris, 2002.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Pieter J. J. van Thiel<\/strong> et al., <em>*Rembrandt: A Genius and His Impact*<\/em>, exhibition catalog, Rijksmuseum, 1991.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>About Operation Night Watch<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Robert Erdmann<\/strong> (chief scientist at the Rijksmuseum), publications on AI-based reconstruction (2021).<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Operation Night Watch<\/strong> Official Website: Real-time tracking of scientific discoveries.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Institutional Documentation<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.rijksmuseum.nl\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam<\/strong><\/a> \u2014 a museum since 1808.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.rembrandthuis.nl\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>Rembrandt House, Amsterdam<\/strong><\/a> \u2014 the painter\u2019s studio-museum.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nationalgallery.org.uk\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>National Gallery, London<\/strong><\/a> \u2014 holds the complete copy by Gerrit Lundens.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>See also on Hors Cadre<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/horscadre.paris\/en\/rembrandt-the-self-portrait-as-a-diary-of-a-life\/\" data-type=\"post\" data-id=\"565\">Rembrandt\u2014the Self-Portrait as a Diary of a Life<\/a> \u2014a portrait of the artist, with a comprehensive biographical context including the pivotal year of 1642 (Saskia&#8217;s death).<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/horscadre.paris\/en\/caravaggio-the-painter-who-depicted-a-sword-at-the-waist\/\" data-type=\"post\" data-id=\"329\">Caravaggio\u2014the inventor of chiaroscuro<\/a> \u2014the inventor of Baroque chiaroscuro, which inspired Rembrandt through engravings circulating in Amsterdam.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>\u2014 M<\/em><\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Amsterdam, summer of 1642. A monumental canvas measuring 363 centimeters high by 437 centimeters wide \u2014 nearly sixteen square meters of oil painting\u2014was delivered to the musketeers of the city\u2019s District II civic militia. The painting was intended to adorn the great hall of the Kloveniersdoelen (Archers\u2019 Hall), the company\u2019s headquarters. The painter, Rembrandt van&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1416,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_uag_custom_page_level_css":"","_kad_blocks_custom_css":"","_kad_blocks_head_custom_js":"","_kad_blocks_body_custom_js":"","_kad_blocks_footer_custom_js":"","_kad_post_transparent":"","_kad_post_title":"","_kad_post_layout":"","_kad_post_sidebar_id":"","_kad_post_content_style":"","_kad_post_vertical_padding":"","_kad_post_feature":"","_kad_post_feature_position":"","_kad_post_header":false,"_kad_post_footer":false,"_kad_post_classname":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[36],"tags":[],"salle":[20],"class_list":["post-1415","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-masterpieces","salle-1601-1650"],"acf":[],"taxonomy_info":{"category":[{"value":36,"label":"Masterpieces"}],"salle":[{"value":20,"label":"1601-1650"}]},"featured_image_src_large":["https:\/\/horscadre.paris\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/La-Ronde-de-nuit-1024x833.jpg",1024,833,true],"author_info":{"display_name":"admin5462","author_link":"https:\/\/horscadre.paris\/en\/author\/admin5462\/"},"comment_info":0,"category_info":[{"term_id":36,"name":"Masterpieces","slug":"masterpieces","term_group":0,"term_taxonomy_id":36,"taxonomy":"category","description":"","parent":0,"count":81,"filter":"raw","cat_ID":36,"category_count":81,"category_description":"","cat_name":"Masterpieces","category_nicename":"masterpieces","category_parent":0}],"tag_info":false,"uagb_featured_image_src":{"full":["https:\/\/horscadre.paris\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/La-Ronde-de-nuit.jpg",1280,1041,false],"thumbnail":["https:\/\/horscadre.paris\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/La-Ronde-de-nuit-150x150.jpg",150,150,true],"medium":["https:\/\/horscadre.paris\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/La-Ronde-de-nuit-300x244.jpg",300,244,true],"medium_large":["https:\/\/horscadre.paris\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/La-Ronde-de-nuit-768x625.jpg",768,625,true],"large":["https:\/\/horscadre.paris\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/La-Ronde-de-nuit-1024x833.jpg",1024,833,true],"1536x1536":["https:\/\/horscadre.paris\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/La-Ronde-de-nuit.jpg",1280,1041,false],"2048x2048":["https:\/\/horscadre.paris\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/La-Ronde-de-nuit.jpg",1280,1041,false]},"uagb_author_info":{"display_name":"admin5462","author_link":"https:\/\/horscadre.paris\/en\/author\/admin5462\/"},"uagb_comment_info":0,"uagb_excerpt":"Amsterdam, summer of 1642. A monumental canvas measuring 363 centimeters high by 437 centimeters wide \u2014 nearly sixteen square meters of oil painting\u2014was delivered to the musketeers of the city\u2019s District II civic militia. The painting was intended to adorn the great hall of the Kloveniersdoelen (Archers\u2019 Hall), the company\u2019s headquarters. The painter, Rembrandt van...","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/horscadre.paris\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1415","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/horscadre.paris\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/horscadre.paris\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/horscadre.paris\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/horscadre.paris\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1415"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/horscadre.paris\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1415\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1981,"href":"https:\/\/horscadre.paris\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1415\/revisions\/1981"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/horscadre.paris\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1416"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/horscadre.paris\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1415"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/horscadre.paris\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1415"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/horscadre.paris\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1415"},{"taxonomy":"salle","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/horscadre.paris\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/salle?post=1415"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}